2007
DOI: 10.1039/b702840g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational relaxation of O2(X 3 Σ–g, v = 9–13) by collisions with O2

Abstract: Vibrationally excited O(2)(X(3) Sigmag(-)) was generated in the UV laser flash photolysis of O(3) and single vibrational level was detected via laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) in the B(3) Sigmau(-)-X(3) Sigmag(-) system. The time-resolved LIF of adjacent vibrational levels has been analyzed by the integrated-profiles method and the rate coefficients for single-quantum relaxation, O(2)(X(3)Sigmag(-), v = 9-13)+ O(2)(v = 0)--> O(2)(X(3)Sigmag(-), v - 1)+ O(2)(v = 1), have been determined. To the best of our kno… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It agrees with some of the room temperature measured rate coefficients ͑v = 3 and 5͒ and overpredicts the measured rate coefficients for v = 2 and underpredicts those for v = 4. For O 2 ͑v =8͒ it agrees with the measurement of Park and Slanger 3 and gives a value smaller than the measurement of Klatt et al 5 and the calculation of Hernández et al 13 For O 2 ͑v = 9 and 10͒ the results of Klatt et al 5 and Hernández et al 13 agree with the measurements of Watanabe et al 37 Since our calculation has the formalism of near-resonant vibration-to-vibration ET mechanism, we did not feel that it should give reliable results for v Ն 9. Our calculation can be extended to the transfer of vibrational energy from O 2 to CO 2 without further assumption or modifications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…It agrees with some of the room temperature measured rate coefficients ͑v = 3 and 5͒ and overpredicts the measured rate coefficients for v = 2 and underpredicts those for v = 4. For O 2 ͑v =8͒ it agrees with the measurement of Park and Slanger 3 and gives a value smaller than the measurement of Klatt et al 5 and the calculation of Hernández et al 13 For O 2 ͑v = 9 and 10͒ the results of Klatt et al 5 and Hernández et al 13 agree with the measurements of Watanabe et al 37 Since our calculation has the formalism of near-resonant vibration-to-vibration ET mechanism, we did not feel that it should give reliable results for v Ն 9. Our calculation can be extended to the transfer of vibrational energy from O 2 to CO 2 without further assumption or modifications.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…[19][20][21] It is well known that there are two main channels in the UV photolysis of O 3 at λ ≈ 250 nm 1,13,22 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact is that for such v' values in reaction (6), the energy transfer from the oxygen molecule to the nitrogen molecule has an almost resonant character. In both (5) and 6cases, it is obvious that a change in the reaction rate coefficient with a change in v is associated with a defect of the reaction energy (see Figure 4 where both experimental data [29,48,[50][51][52][53][54] and theoretical estimates [55] are presented). The smaller defect of energy, the greater the reaction rate coefficient.…”
Section: Energy Transfer In Collisional Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate coefficients of O2(X 3 Σg, v) + O2 → products[29,32,48,[50][51][52][53][54][55] and O2(X 3 Σg, v) + N2 → products[29] depending on module of energy mismatch. The numbers indicate values of the vibrational quantum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%