2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2010.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrational spectra of discrete UO22+ halide complexes in the gas phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
42
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
8
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…CID of the CH 3 COS complex also resulted in CH 3 COSH loss (30%), to yield what can be formally represented as [UO 2 (CH 3 COS)-(CH 2 COS)] − , an intriguing species. In the CID mass spectra of the complexes that yielded [U V O 2 X 2 ] − ions, formation of [U VI O 2 X 2 (O 2 )] − was also observed during the 40 ms period of the CID process (shown for X = NCS in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information).The halide complexes of uranyl(VI) with Cl and Br did not yield any CID product ions under our experimental conditions; interestingly, Groenewold et al 30 observed in IRMPD experiments that [U VI O 2 X 3 ] − complexes eliminated neutral [U VI O 2 X 2 ] for X = Cl and Br and eliminated a halogen radical for X = Br and I. In the present experiments, CID of [U VI O 2 X 3 ] − may similarly result in fragmentation to [U VI O 2 X 2 ] and X − , with the halide anion unobserved due to the low-mass detection limit imposed by the instrumental parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CID of the CH 3 COS complex also resulted in CH 3 COSH loss (30%), to yield what can be formally represented as [UO 2 (CH 3 COS)-(CH 2 COS)] − , an intriguing species. In the CID mass spectra of the complexes that yielded [U V O 2 X 2 ] − ions, formation of [U VI O 2 X 2 (O 2 )] − was also observed during the 40 ms period of the CID process (shown for X = NCS in Figure S1 of the Supporting Information).The halide complexes of uranyl(VI) with Cl and Br did not yield any CID product ions under our experimental conditions; interestingly, Groenewold et al 30 observed in IRMPD experiments that [U VI O 2 X 3 ] − complexes eliminated neutral [U VI O 2 X 2 ] for X = Cl and Br and eliminated a halogen radical for X = Br and I. In the present experiments, CID of [U VI O 2 X 3 ] − may similarly result in fragmentation to [U VI O 2 X 2 ] and X − , with the halide anion unobserved due to the low-mass detection limit imposed by the instrumental parameters.…”
supporting
confidence: 63%
“…The halide complexes of uranyl(VI) with Cl and Br did not yield any CID product ions under our experimental conditions; interestingly, Groenewold et al 30 and X − , with the halide anion unobserved due to the low-mass detection limit imposed by the instrumental parameters. CID of the complexes with X = NO 3 and ClO 4 both yielded the oxo species [UO 2 X 2 (O)] − by loss of NO 2 and ClO 3 , respectively; these dissociation channels have been previously observed.…”
Section: ■ Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…A scaling factor of 0.98 was applied to the computed DFT frequencies to account for mode anharmonicities and deficiency in the exchangecorrelation functional used. [51][52][53] As is apparent in Fig. 6(a) there is good agreement between the IRMPD spectra and the computational results for the GS isomer.…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…To confirm that UO 4 − results from the reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with O 2 , an excess of isotopically labeled 18 O 2 was introduced into the ion trap. The result is shown in Figure 3, where the dominant product peak at 306 m/ z corresponds to reaction of UO 2 (C 2 O 4 ) − with 18 O 2 to yield UO 2 18 O 2 (unless specified otherwise, O refers to the 99.8% natural abundance 16 O isotope). The minor peak at 304 m/z is attributed to oxo-exchange of UO 2 18 O 2 − with background water in the trap to yield UO 3 18 O − .…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%