1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80150-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vibrissal roughness discrimination is barrelcortex-dependent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
59
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the textures used in those studies, the rough surface used here had a much finer scale. Lesions of the somatosensory ''barrel'' cortex led to deficits in vibrissal-based texture discrimination [12], and we expected that differences in the firing of cortical neurons would be small but detectable, with at least some neurons firing at higher average rates when the rat palpated the rough compared to the smooth surface. We found, however, that neither overall firing rates nor temporal discharge patterns are robust indicators of the rough and smooth surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the textures used in those studies, the rough surface used here had a much finer scale. Lesions of the somatosensory ''barrel'' cortex led to deficits in vibrissal-based texture discrimination [12], and we expected that differences in the firing of cortical neurons would be small but detectable, with at least some neurons firing at higher average rates when the rat palpated the rough compared to the smooth surface. We found, however, that neither overall firing rates nor temporal discharge patterns are robust indicators of the rough and smooth surfaces.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some whisker-dependent behaviors, including gap crossing (Hutson and Masterton, 1986), texture discrimination (Guić- Robles et al, 1992), and aperture width discrimination (Krupa et al, 2001), appear to require the somatosensory cortex. In contrast, rats performing passive stimulus frequency discrimination are unaffected by lesions of the somatosensory cortex (Hutson and Masterton, 1986).…”
Section: Dependence Of Object Localization On Cortexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we used a modification of the Lashley jump-stand apparatus (Guic-Robles et al, 1989; Cybulska-Klosowicz and Kossut, 2001). Successful performance of this task has been convincingly shown to depend on an intact barrel cortex (Guic-Robles et al, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%