2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-013-0322-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vicarious Cross-Calibration of the China Environment Satellite Using Nearly Simultaneously Observations of Landsat-7 ETM+ Sensor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past, methods for removing the intermission difference have focused on the intermission consistency of chlorophyll-a concentration (Gregg et al, 2009;Kahru et al, 2015;Mélin et al, 2017;Pottier et al, 2006;Saulquin et al, 2013). One of these methods is the empirical gain factor cross-calibration approach, which reduces the deviation between two measurements (Eplee et al, 2011;Mélin et al, 2017;Quan, 2014;Teillet et al, 2007). The empirical gain factor approach is similar to the empirical satellite-to-satellite approach that Kahru et al (2015) proposed.…”
Section: Comparing Gain Factor Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, methods for removing the intermission difference have focused on the intermission consistency of chlorophyll-a concentration (Gregg et al, 2009;Kahru et al, 2015;Mélin et al, 2017;Pottier et al, 2006;Saulquin et al, 2013). One of these methods is the empirical gain factor cross-calibration approach, which reduces the deviation between two measurements (Eplee et al, 2011;Mélin et al, 2017;Quan, 2014;Teillet et al, 2007). The empirical gain factor approach is similar to the empirical satellite-to-satellite approach that Kahru et al (2015) proposed.…”
Section: Comparing Gain Factor Calibration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%