2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-77967-2_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vicinity-Based Abstraction: VA-DGCNN Architecture for Noisy 3D Indoor Object Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Shortcuts were added between the different layers to link the hierarchical features to calculate useful edge vectors. VA-DGCNN [33] proposed a novel, feature-preserving vicinity abstraction (VA) layer for the EdgeConv module. Unlike the original DGCNN, local information is aggregated before further processing, rather than processed one point at a time with neighbors.…”
Section: Graph Convolutional Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Shortcuts were added between the different layers to link the hierarchical features to calculate useful edge vectors. VA-DGCNN [33] proposed a novel, feature-preserving vicinity abstraction (VA) layer for the EdgeConv module. Unlike the original DGCNN, local information is aggregated before further processing, rather than processed one point at a time with neighbors.…”
Section: Graph Convolutional Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, evaluating area 5 can well test the generalization performance of the network. We compare the classical semantic segmentation methods [5,8,16,28,45], the semantic and instance joint segmentation methods [25,26], the GCN based semantic segmentation methods [17,18,29,33], and the results are shown in Table 1. [17] 49.0 -83.2 91.1 97.3 74.5 0.0 11.9 49.5 33.5 66.9 69.4 20.5 47.5 34.7 40.8 3D-GCN [18] 51.9 -84.6 91.4 97.1 75.9 0.1 22.3 43.5 30.1 71.5 79.4 21.9 53.7 42.9 44.9 ASIS [25] 53.4 60.9 86.9 92.0 98.0 75.3 0.0 10.1 49.9 24.2 72.9 78.1 33.4 58.4 51.0 50.7 JSNet++ [26] 58.0 --93.7 98.5 80.5 0.0 16.9 57.2 41.9 76.8 84.7 30.5 60.2 58.3 54.9 RandLA-Net [28] We notice that all methods perform similarly in the ceiling, floor, and beam categories, as they can be easily classified based on the location in the room.…”
Section: S3dis Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%