2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26729-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vickers hardness prediction from machine learning methods

Abstract: The search for new superhard materials is of great interest for extreme industrial applications. However, the theoretical prediction of hardness is still a challenge for the scientific community, given the difficulty of modeling plastic behavior of solids. Different hardness models have been proposed over the years. Still, they are either too complicated to use, inaccurate when extrapolating to a wide variety of solids or require coding knowledge. In this investigation, we built a successful machine learning m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, while the Vickers hardness procedure is used frequently for testing metallic systems and other hard materials, we note that its primary design targets softer materials like plastics and assesses their resistance to deformation under constant stress. However, it was found to be reliable in predicting the hardness of various metallic systems with sufficient accuracy compared to experimental data, 52,53 such as that considered in the current study.…”
Section: Materials Advances Papermentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, while the Vickers hardness procedure is used frequently for testing metallic systems and other hard materials, we note that its primary design targets softer materials like plastics and assesses their resistance to deformation under constant stress. However, it was found to be reliable in predicting the hardness of various metallic systems with sufficient accuracy compared to experimental data, 52,53 such as that considered in the current study.…”
Section: Materials Advances Papermentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Open metallic systems with sufficient accuracy compared to experimental data [52,53], such as the one being considered in the current study.…”
Section: Materials Advances Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dovale et al used a gradient boosting regressor (GBR) to predict hardness based on mechanical properties such as bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young's modulus (Y), and Poisson's ratio (ν). They also implemented the classification model (GBC) to predict the best relationship for calculating hardness with these input variables [14]. Jeon et al employed support vector regression (SVR), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), random forest regression (RFR), and artificial neural networks (ANN) to predict the hardness of low-alloy steels under various tempering conditions such as temperature, holding time, and alloy composition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%