2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00038-020-01481-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Victims, bullies and bully–victims: prevalence and association with negative health outcomes from a cross-sectional study in São Paulo, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the substance abuse, and in particular alcohol abuse, in the meta-analysis of Vrijen et al [ 32 ], it was pointed out that the bullying perpetration in childhood was positively associated with alcohol use. Furthermore, Loch et al [ 33 ] stressed that bullies were more likely to consume alcohol and to be involved in binge drinking. In the COMPASS study of Williams et al [ 34 ], it was noticed that being a bully at baseline, in the studied student population, was associated with an increase of odds for initiating binge drinking in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the substance abuse, and in particular alcohol abuse, in the meta-analysis of Vrijen et al [ 32 ], it was pointed out that the bullying perpetration in childhood was positively associated with alcohol use. Furthermore, Loch et al [ 33 ] stressed that bullies were more likely to consume alcohol and to be involved in binge drinking. In the COMPASS study of Williams et al [ 34 ], it was noticed that being a bully at baseline, in the studied student population, was associated with an increase of odds for initiating binge drinking in future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bullying was measured using a 10-item scale (Alsaker, 2012; Murray et al, 2019) with five questions about victimization (Cronbach’s a: 0.70. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA): Loadings: 0.43–0.47; v2 = 36.206 (4df); p < 0.001; RMSEA = 0.05; CFI: 0.987) and five about perpetration (Cronbach’s a: 0.71; CFA: Loadings: 0.36–0.67; v2 = 30.779 (4df); p \0.001; RMSEA = 0.05; CFI:0,988) (Loch et al, 2020). Adolescents self-reported the frequency of bullying victimization in the last 12 months through five questions regarding specific types of victimization, following the general question: since August 2016, how often have you (1) been ignored or excluded on purpose since (2) been made fun of or called names (3) been punched, kicked, bitten or had your hair pulled 4) had some of your belongings taken, broken or hidden (4) been sexually harassed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of bullying victimization in adolescents from low- and middle-income countries is 35.9% (Smith et al, 2021), suggesting that the number of bullies and adolescents who witness bullying should be even higher. However, in Brazil, bullying perpetration prevalence is lower, with a 7.2% prevalence of victimization and 20.8% perpetration of bullying found in 2012 (Malta et al, 2014), and a 18.3% prevalence of victimization and 4.9% perpetration of bullying in a population-based study conducted with a representative sample of ( n = 2,680) schoolchildren in the city of São Paulo, Brazil (Loch et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%