Victorian healthcare experience survey 2016–2018; evaluation of interventions to improve the patient experience

Abstract

Background Patient experience is recognised as a quality of care indicator and increasingly health services are working on achieving set targets and improving their performance. Interventions at the point of care targeting communication with patients, patient engagement in care processes and discharge planning are associated with better patient experience. However, their efficacy and application to different contexts are still unclear. The aims were to describe the interventions implemented by health services to improve patient experience, their impact on overall patient experiences and specific experiences in areas of communication, discharge planning, patient education on treatment/tests, the physical environment and access to care. Methods Secondary data analysis of the Victorian Healthcare Experience inpatient surveys reported in September 2016 and 2018 and content analysis of interventions published in the Victorian Quality Account for 2017 from 59 public health services in Victoria, Australia. The interventions were categorised using an adapted taxonomy of professional interventions by the Cochrane EPOC Review Group. Univariate tests and confirmatory factor analysis were conducted to test measure invariance across the 2016 and 2018 groups and examine the association between each of the intervention categories on overall patient experience measure and specific outcome measures. Results This study found that the overall patient experience was consistent (93%) between 2016 and 2018 samples. In comparing impact, a single intervention rather than none or multiple interventions in communication, respect and dignity and treatment and disease education areas were associated with a higher level of the overall patient experience. Interventions in waiting time, access to service, care continuity and emotional support categories were associated with a decrease in overall patient experience. Conclusion This study found that to improve the overall patient experience, more focus is needed on evidence-based interventions in dignity and respect and emotional support. Furthermore, the choice of interventions should be guided by evidence of their efficacy and prioritising implementing one intervention well, provides more gains.

“The Terminology Might Be Ahead of Practice”: Embedding Shared Decision Making in Practice—Barriers and Facilitators to Implementation of SDM in the Context of Maternity Care

“… 11 , 60 In Victoria, SDM is measured by the Victorian Health Experience Survey, which includes 5 questions on SDM. 61 These survey questions do not constitute a validated measure of SDM and therefore does not measure SDM appropriately (although it is an improvement on the previous version, which included fewer questions on SDM 62 ). As such, policy makers report they have no way of explicitly measuring whether health services respond to SDM implementation policy.…”

The added value of the artificial intelligence patient-reported experience measure (AI-PREM tool) in clinical practise: Deployment in a vestibular schwannoma care pathway

“…Improving organizational factors for a better patient experience will not only benefit patients but has also been shown to enhance physician satisfaction [ 37 ] . However, achieving improvements in the patient experience can be challenging [ 38 ] . A large proportion of patients report high PREM scores.…”

Dying, death and bereavement: developing a national survey of bereaved relatives

“…There is a growing body of literature reporting on the implementation of experience surveys with concerns that such information is not always used to improve care, a significant limitation of such surveys. Important lessons have been learned on bridging the gap between measurement and implementation of improvements which need to be considered to enhance care experience by healthcare services [ 79 , 80 ]. Despite the above limitations, the data and resulting survey instrument represents the most important aspects of care to be included in a national survey of bereaved relatives in the Republic of Ireland.…”