2012 4th International Conference on Intelligent Human Computer Interaction (IHCI) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/ihci.2012.6481872
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video & EOG based investigation of pure saccades in human subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second season's baseline latency EOG measures were longer than the first season's baseline latency measures recorded using high-speed video. Both forms of saccade measurement have been validated against gold standards for eye tracking systems 36,73 and with each other, 40,42 reinforcing that this saccade latency increase represents a measurable difference and not an experimental error. Finally, we acknowledge that specialized equipment, including head impact sensors and a saccade measurement system, are required to perform this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The second season's baseline latency EOG measures were longer than the first season's baseline latency measures recorded using high-speed video. Both forms of saccade measurement have been validated against gold standards for eye tracking systems 36,73 and with each other, 40,42 reinforcing that this saccade latency increase represents a measurable difference and not an experimental error. Finally, we acknowledge that specialized equipment, including head impact sensors and a saccade measurement system, are required to perform this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…36 In the second season, electro-oculography (EOG) was used to capture participants' saccade latency and direction. [38][39][40][41] Participants were fitted with three disposable surface electrodes (AM-N00S/E, AMBU Blue Sensor Adhesive Snap Electrode; Ambu Inc, Glen Burnie, MD) placed at the outer canthi of each eye and the center of the forehead. The voltages from the electrodes were amplified using an isolated electrophysiological amplifier (Model 2024F, Intronix Technologies Corporation, Bolton, ON, Canada; bandwidth DC to 10 kHz) and sampled at 1000 Hz with a 16-bit analog-to-digital converter (USB 6211; National Instruments) using a custom LabVIEW program.…”
Section: Saccade Apparatus and Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The bipolar EOG electrodes [3] were placed near the canthus of both the eyes, with the reference electrode being placed in the middle of the forehead. Fig.…”
Section: Data Capturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amplitude of EOG ranges between 50 to 3500 µV, and its frequency components go from 0 to 100Hz [1]. EOG signals are usually contaminated with noise, and hence it introduces errors in parameter estimation [3]. The major interferences in the capture of EOG are:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%