Proceedings of the 23rd Brazillian Symposium on Multimedia and the Web 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3126858.3126897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Annotation by Cascading Microtasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the quality and productivity of video annotation, previous works [9], [30], [42], [43] have focused on impacting factors from the perspective of the annotators, ignoring the impact from the quality of the recorded video [18], [23], [44], [45]. In the design of ARiana, we have considered the video recording process and its impact on the quality and efficiency of video annotation.…”
Section: B Video Annotation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the quality and productivity of video annotation, previous works [9], [30], [42], [43] have focused on impacting factors from the perspective of the annotators, ignoring the impact from the quality of the recorded video [18], [23], [44], [45]. In the design of ARiana, we have considered the video recording process and its impact on the quality and efficiency of video annotation.…”
Section: B Video Annotation Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workers' contributions are processed and aggregated using different statistical-based algorithms to generate similar, equivalent, complementary results, or with acceptance similar to those that would be generated by specialists. This can be seen in the article [4], in which crowdsourcing was used to generate multimedia presentations based on video annotation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%