2016
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video‐Based Interaction, Negotiation for Comprehensibility, and Second Language Speech Learning: A Longitudinal Study

Abstract: This study examined the impact of video‐based conversational interaction on the longitudinal development (one academic semester) of second language production by college‐level Japanese English‐as‐a‐foreign‐language learners. Students in the experimental group engaged in weekly dyadic conversation exchanges with native speakers in the United States via telecommunication tools. The native speaker interlocutors were trained to provide interactional feedback (recasts) when the nonnative speakers’ utterances hinder… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, while video mediation allows participants to utilize the affordances of combining audio, video, and text (Jauregi & Bañados, ), it limits interactants’ capabilities regarding eye contact, gestures, and pointing (Kern, ). Although this study did not find statistically significant improvement in comprehensibility in the video‐mediated context, it is possible that the participants’ off‐line performance may have improved (see Saito & Akiyama, in press). By extension, future studies may compare the modes of communication (i.e., video vs. face‐to‐face tandem projects) (e.g., Canto, Jauregi, & van den Bergh, ) and how the modality factor influences the development of comprehensibility.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, while video mediation allows participants to utilize the affordances of combining audio, video, and text (Jauregi & Bañados, ), it limits interactants’ capabilities regarding eye contact, gestures, and pointing (Kern, ). Although this study did not find statistically significant improvement in comprehensibility in the video‐mediated context, it is possible that the participants’ off‐line performance may have improved (see Saito & Akiyama, in press). By extension, future studies may compare the modes of communication (i.e., video vs. face‐to‐face tandem projects) (e.g., Canto, Jauregi, & van den Bergh, ) and how the modality factor influences the development of comprehensibility.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Based on a precursor study (Saito & Akiyama, in press) that took an experimental approach to examining the effect of eTandem interaction on the off‐line performance of English learners in Japan (i.e., English speech by the Japanese native speakers who interacted with the Japanese learners in this study) in a pre/posttest design, this study examined the on‐line performance of the Japanese learners by analyzing the actual speech of the video interaction. This focus was motivated by moves to emphasize context‐sensitive, ecologically valid accounts of SLA findings (Atkinson, ).…”
Section: Speech Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the control group (which was involved with lexicogrammar exercise activities) did not show any significant improvement in their oral abilities, a great deal of successful L2 speech learning was observed among the experimental group (which participated in weekly, dyadic task-based interaction activities with native interlocutors in the US). In sum, these two longitudinal studies (Saito & Akiyama, 2016;Trofimovich et al, 2009) have supported the importance of production and interaction opportunities in order to improve L2 speech in an efficient and effective manner in EFL classroom settings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the production-based instruction group continued to improve their overall comprehensibility and fluency throughout the project, the comprehensionbased instruction group's gains plateaued after the first year. Saito and Akiyama (2016) recently examined the extent to which Japanese EFL university students improved their L2 oral FOREIGN LANGUAGE SPEECH LEARNING proficiency over one academic semester as a result of two different types of instructional treatments. Whereas the control group (which was involved with lexicogrammar exercise activities) did not show any significant improvement in their oral abilities, a great deal of successful L2 speech learning was observed among the experimental group (which participated in weekly, dyadic task-based interaction activities with native interlocutors in the US).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our precursor research (Saito & Akiyama, ), we reported that one academic semester of video‐based L2 interaction activity was facilitative of various dimensions of the Japanese learners’ spontaneous production ability development (e.g., comprehensibility, fluency, and vocabulary). In this article, we aimed to revisit the data set to examine the effects of long‐term interaction on the development of L2 comprehension ability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%