2000
DOI: 10.1006/ijhc.1999.0335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video data and video links in mediated communication: what do users value?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be because that it is hard for people for to distinguish the temporal difference when the frame rate is larger than 15fps. This exactly matches the result in [4] Figure 5 shows the comparison among MCDE, MSE and DSCQS for different number of Huffman codes with the same target frame rate (8fps). In this figure, only MCDE decreases as the number of Huffman codes increases.…”
Section: Evaluation 31 Comparison Among Mcde Mse and Dscqssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…It might be because that it is hard for people for to distinguish the temporal difference when the frame rate is larger than 15fps. This exactly matches the result in [4] Figure 5 shows the comparison among MCDE, MSE and DSCQS for different number of Huffman codes with the same target frame rate (8fps). In this figure, only MCDE decreases as the number of Huffman codes increases.…”
Section: Evaluation 31 Comparison Among Mcde Mse and Dscqssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1), the standard image of the whole remote group is kept (in the focus groups meetings, participants repeatedly expressed that this "whole room view" is very important for them), while video streams displaying individual remote participants are added. 2) Implementation: One of the groups was placed in a videoconferencing room satisfying the AccessGrid Point requirements 7 . The whole group view was recorded by a tracking camera and SHURE Easyflex EZB/C microphones provided the audio acquisition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Changing the size and/or resolution of the video window did not make any measurable difference either in task results or subjective view of the participants [1], [7], [8].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the frame rate does affect the perceived visual quality. The studies of subjective video quality [4,10,20,21] show that people perceive video quality degradation as the frame rate decreases. While the traditional average PSNR or MSE cannot measure the tradeoff between the frame rate and single frame quality, the works in [8,15] provide a solution, replacing the dropped frames by the previous frames to compute the average PSNR.…”
Section: Distortion Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%