2013
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Game Use in Boys With Autism Spectrum Disorder, ADHD, or Typical Development

Abstract: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT: Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and those with ADHD are at risk for problematic video game use. However, group differences in media use or in the factors associated with problematic video game use have not been studied. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:Boys with ASD and ADHD demonstrated greater problematic video game use than did boys with typical development. Inattention was uniquely associated with problematic use for both groups, and role-playing game genre was associated wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
126
2
8

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
12
126
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reason for exclusion Barnett et al [86] Participants are teachers Benyakorn et al [87] Not interventional Bishop [88] Intervention not technology Bonarini et al [89] Population focus not ADHD Bul et al [90] Outcome measures do not assess ADHD-related difficulties Chan et al [91] Not interventional Chen et al [92] Not interventional Christiansen et al [93] Intervention reliant on others Dale and Grut [94] Not exclusively for ADHD Duffy [95] Population focus not ADHD Enebrink et al [96] Population focus not ADHD References Reason for exclusion Epstein et al [97] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Fiellin et al [98] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual et al [99] Population focus not ADHD Frutos-Pascual and GarciaZapirain [100] Participants typically developing, not ADHD Gray et al [72] ADHD not primary diagnosis of participants Halperin et al [101] Intervention not technology Janeslätt et al [102] Intervention not technology Kim et al [103] Intervention not technology Lim et al [104] Intervention reliant on health care professionals Mazurek and Engelhardt [105] Not interventional Myers et al [106] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Nie et al [107] Intervention not technology Pandria et al [108] Not interventional Rohani et al [109] Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Rosch and Mostofsky [110] Not interventional Schafer et al [111] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Schuck et al [112] Participants not received ADHD diagnosis Shah et al 2012 Not interventional Silva et al [113] Technology as outcome measure, not intervention Steeger et al 2016 Participants ADHD diagnosis not confirmed Stephenson [114] Population focus not ADHD Tse et al …”
Section: Appendix 2: References and Reasons For Exclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study revealed that players with autism spend more time using video games in relation to the group of players with ADHD or without psychiatric disorders 34 . Another psychopathology related to video game addiction is major depression 35 .…”
Section: Comorbidities: Video Game Addictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies found that children and adolescents with ASD spent more than two hours playing video games per day (Mazurek & Engelhardt, 2013b;Mazurek & Wenstrup, 2013). Moreover, children with ASD spent more time playing video games per day than typically developing (TD) children (Mazurek & Engelhardt, 2013b), TD siblings (Mazurek & Wenstrup, 2013), and those with other disabilities .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…benefits, many researchers have focused on developing applications of game technology for improving social and behavioral outcomes in individuals with ASD (Durkin, 2010;Ferguson, Anderson-Hanley, Mazurek, Parsons, & Warren, 2012;Grynszpan, Weiss, Perez-Diaz, & Gal, 2014;Moore & Taylor, 2000). In contrast, others have focused on understanding potentially negative consequences of video game play in individuals with ASD, including pathological game play (Mazurek & Engelhardt, 2013b;Mazurek & Wenstrup, 2013), problem behaviors (Engelhardt & Mazurek, 2014;Mazurek & Engelhardt, 2013a), and sleep problems (Engelhardt, Mazurek, & Sohl, 2013). Despite this increased interest in understanding both positive and negative video game effects, many unanswered questions remain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%