2017
DOI: 10.11591/ijece.v7i2.pp831-841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Inter-frame Forgery Detection Approach for Surveillance and Mobile Recorded Videos

Abstract: We are living in an age where use of multimedia technologies like digital recorders and mobile phones is increasing rapidly. On the other hand, digital content manipulating softwares are also increasing making it easy for an individual to doctor the recorded content with trivial consumption of time and wealth. Digital multimedia forensics is gaining utmost importance to restrict unethical use of such easily available tampering techniques. These days, it is common for people to record videos using their smart p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 lists the average accuracy value of the proposed models and the set of methods that handled the inter-frame video forgery. [11] 2017 90 [12] 2017 97.5…”
Section: Results Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 6 lists the average accuracy value of the proposed models and the set of methods that handled the inter-frame video forgery. [11] 2017 90 [12] 2017 97.5…”
Section: Results Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presented in this section is a concise review of relevant research to identify the mentioned video forgeries. [11] Proposed forensic technique allowed the detection of inter-frame forgery, in H.264 and Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG-2) encoded videos. This implemented an objectivity approach for the automated detection of position and the manipulation by using optical flow and the residual gradient.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the spike count regardless of the number of frames in the video, the proposed technique automatically detects video manipulation. This method achieved an accuracy of 83% [101].…”
Section: Residual Gradient and Optical Flow Gradientmentioning
confidence: 89%
“… SYSU-OBJFORG Dataset The precision is up to 83.37% The problem of selecting the tampered frames from the double compressed equivalents remained. [ 92 ] 2017 Prediction Residual and Optical Flow Group 1 was captured in H.264 on a Sony XPERIA Z2 from security cameras dubbed ‘Presto’ and ‘Hikvision.’ Group 2 was initially collected in H.264 utilizing a SONY XPERIA Z2 from surveillance cameras named ‘Presto’ and ‘Hikvision.’ The accuracy reaches up to 86% When employing low-quality movies, the proposed technique’s efficiency is minimal. [ 206 ] 2017 Frame Duplication /Mirroring Detection Virtual Dub, an open-source video editor, was used to construct a collection of falsified videos for the tests.…”
Section: Video Forensics Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%