2015
DOI: 10.1080/1350293x.2015.1062662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video observations of children's perspectives on their lived experiences: Challenges in the relations between the researcher and children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While there remains some debate about how best to authenticate and meaningfully incorporate children's voices into the research process (see Zhang, 2015), there is broad support for a number of research methods that allow researchers to 'listen' to children (Clark, 2001;Dockett, Einarsdottir, & Perry, 2011;Lipponen, Rajala, Hilppo¨, & Paananen, 2015). These include the Mosaic Approach (Clark, 2001), the Jigsaw Approach (Stephenson, 2012a), the Children's Voices Framework (Harris & Manatakis, 2013), and visual and video observatory methods (Clark, 2011;Pa´lmado´ttir & Einarsdo´ttir, 2015), which suggest future ways to capture children's understandings and experiences of their health and wellbeing, and challenge the nature of current knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there remains some debate about how best to authenticate and meaningfully incorporate children's voices into the research process (see Zhang, 2015), there is broad support for a number of research methods that allow researchers to 'listen' to children (Clark, 2001;Dockett, Einarsdottir, & Perry, 2011;Lipponen, Rajala, Hilppo¨, & Paananen, 2015). These include the Mosaic Approach (Clark, 2001), the Jigsaw Approach (Stephenson, 2012a), the Children's Voices Framework (Harris & Manatakis, 2013), and visual and video observatory methods (Clark, 2011;Pa´lmado´ttir & Einarsdo´ttir, 2015), which suggest future ways to capture children's understandings and experiences of their health and wellbeing, and challenge the nature of current knowledge.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example Hackett (2016), in her year-long ethnographic study exploring very young children's (aged between 24 and 36 months) multi-modal meaning making within a museum, used a handheld video camera in an unstructured way to record anything of interest that occurred during the children's visits. Pálmadóttir and Einarsdóttir's (2016) study investigating young children's lived experiences during free-play time in an Icelandic preschool used a handheld video camera to record small groups of children. As these studies show, this third-person perspective can be effective in offering insights into young children's bodily expressions, language, movement, interaction with others and the ability of an individual to participate in another's lifeworld (Hackett, 2016, Merleau-Ponty, 1962, Pálmadóttir and Einarsdóttir, 2016.…”
Section: What Else Can Gopro Cameras Offer Research With Young Childrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pálmadóttir and Einarsdóttir's (2016) study investigating young children's lived experiences during free-play time in an Icelandic preschool used a handheld video camera to record small groups of children. As these studies show, this third-person perspective can be effective in offering insights into young children's bodily expressions, language, movement, interaction with others and the ability of an individual to participate in another's lifeworld (Hackett, 2016, Merleau-Ponty, 1962, Pálmadóttir and Einarsdóttir, 2016. It is important to appreciate that the video footage captured in these studies represents, owing to the video camera being an extension of the body of the person carrying it, not only a view of what is in front of the camera but also the relations the person behind the camera has with the world (Johansson andLøkken, 2014, Pink, 2009).…”
Section: What Else Can Gopro Cameras Offer Research With Young Childrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interview is perceived as a moment of social interaction, bringing up representative criteria, and, thereby, showing both objective (e.g., concrete facts and objectives), and subjective nature (e.g., attitude, values, and beliefs) of the discursive data (Minayo, 1996). Children's observations were carried out through video recordings, which have been used as a pertinent and adequate tool on many studies with children (Carvalho, Branco, Pedrosa & Gil, 2002;Pálmadóttir & Einarsdóttir 2016;Pedrosa & Carvalho, 2005;Rossmanith et al 2014;). The videos allow us to analyze nonverbal communication and subjective experiences of the children, which are both considered to be important to human development (cf.…”
Section: Data Collection Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%