2020
DOI: 10.3390/app10051793
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Quality of Experience Metric for Dynamic Adaptive Streaming Services Using DASH Standard and Deep Spatial-Temporal Representation of Video

Abstract: DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (HyperText Transfer Protocol)) as a universal unified multimedia streaming standard selects the appropriate video bitrate to improve the user’s Quality of Experience (QoE) according to network conditions, client status, etc. Considering that the quantitative expression of the user’s QoE is also a difficult point in itself, this paper researched the distortion caused due to video compression, network transmission and other aspects, and then proposes a video QoE metric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The predictive models for DASH video streaming [133]- [135] take into consideration the technical characteristics and network's conditions that impacting video quality and consequently QoE. The assessment of QoE relies on subjective metrics such as MOS and ACR [134], [135], as well as objective metrics including the FR MS-SSIM, the RR STRRED and the NR NIQE metric [133]. The highest prediction accuracy is achieved through the utilization of a model based on a combination of RNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms [133], which succeeds to reflect the nonlinearity and complicated temporal dependence owing to adaptive streaming speed adjustments of QoE.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The predictive models for DASH video streaming [133]- [135] take into consideration the technical characteristics and network's conditions that impacting video quality and consequently QoE. The assessment of QoE relies on subjective metrics such as MOS and ACR [134], [135], as well as objective metrics including the FR MS-SSIM, the RR STRRED and the NR NIQE metric [133]. The highest prediction accuracy is achieved through the utilization of a model based on a combination of RNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms [133], which succeeds to reflect the nonlinearity and complicated temporal dependence owing to adaptive streaming speed adjustments of QoE.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest prediction accuracy is achieved through the utilization of a model based on a combination of RNN and long short-term memory (LSTM) algorithms [133], which succeeds to reflect the nonlinearity and complicated temporal dependence owing to adaptive streaming speed adjustments of QoE. In [134], a QoE video DASH metric approach is presented that relies on three-dimensional convolutional neural networks (3D CNN) and LSTM, and utilizes the ridge regression technique to provide a QoE metric, which dynamically describes the correlation among the input characteristics vector and the MOS value. In [135], adaptive bitrate streaming (ABS) algorithms are analyzed, and an ML model based on decision tree regression (DTR), multi-linear regression (MLR) and random forest regression (RFR) is provided to evaluate QoE in DASH video streaming with respect to network metrics.…”
Section: A Video Streamingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following equation is used to convert data back into unnormalize units: Xuni=Xni×(max (Xi)-(min (Xi) +min (Xi), i=1,2,3...n (5) Yunp=Ynp× (max (Yp)min (Yp) +min (Yp), p=1,2…n (6) Where: Xuni: i th unnormalized input value in the dataset. Xni : i th input value in the dataset.…”
Section: Normalisation and Unnormalisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The QoE is the degree of end-user satisfaction that considers all the elements that impact it [4]. The QoE is a critical measure that network operators and service providers can utilize to assess their performance by considering all elements that influence it [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 70.83% of test subjects answered that stalls are the most relevant metric when evaluating the quality of the video. 16.67% of users considered quality the most relevant aspect [9]. The Hammerstein-Wiener predictor has been used to create a QoE evaluator called time-varying QoE Indexer, which accounts for interactions between stalls, analyzes video content and perceptual video quality, and predicts continuous-time QoE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%