Abstract:Automation of dietary assessments allow participant behaviour to be captured by video observation. They also allow clinicians to identify areas which effect reporting accuracy. This observational study describes the differences in behaviour according to the type of foods selected by participants using a dietary assessment website encompassing diet history methodology.
“…This method of dietary assessment may be self-administered or interviewer administered each of which has its own inherent bias. Underreporting of calories consumed is commonly seen with this method of assessment and has been related to both gender, primarily females, and weight status, primarily overweight (Probst et al, 2009). The bias related to the administration method, interviewer or self-administered, also has further impact upon the detail obtained from the participants (Black and Cole, 2001) though repeated use can help to create a picture of usual intake of the participants.…”
The importance of monitoring dietary intake within a randomized controlled trial becomes vital to justification of the study outcomes when the study is food-based. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine how dietary assessment methods used to monitor dietary intake are reported and whether assisted technologies are used in conducting such assessments. OVID and ScienceDirect databases 2000-2010 were searched for food-based, parallel, randomized controlled trials conducted with humans using the search terms "clinical trial," "diet$ intervention" AND "diet$ assessment," "diet$ method$," "intake," "diet history," "food record," "food frequency questionnaire," "FFQ," "food diary," "24-hour recall." A total of 1364 abstracts were reviewed and 243 studies identified. The size of the study and country of origin appear to be the two most common predictors of reporting both the dietary assessment method and details of the form of assessment. The journal in which the study is published has no impact. Information technology use may increase in the future allowing other methods and forms of dietary assessment to be used efficiently.
“…This method of dietary assessment may be self-administered or interviewer administered each of which has its own inherent bias. Underreporting of calories consumed is commonly seen with this method of assessment and has been related to both gender, primarily females, and weight status, primarily overweight (Probst et al, 2009). The bias related to the administration method, interviewer or self-administered, also has further impact upon the detail obtained from the participants (Black and Cole, 2001) though repeated use can help to create a picture of usual intake of the participants.…”
The importance of monitoring dietary intake within a randomized controlled trial becomes vital to justification of the study outcomes when the study is food-based. A systematic literature review was conducted to determine how dietary assessment methods used to monitor dietary intake are reported and whether assisted technologies are used in conducting such assessments. OVID and ScienceDirect databases 2000-2010 were searched for food-based, parallel, randomized controlled trials conducted with humans using the search terms "clinical trial," "diet$ intervention" AND "diet$ assessment," "diet$ method$," "intake," "diet history," "food record," "food frequency questionnaire," "FFQ," "food diary," "24-hour recall." A total of 1364 abstracts were reviewed and 243 studies identified. The size of the study and country of origin appear to be the two most common predictors of reporting both the dietary assessment method and details of the form of assessment. The journal in which the study is published has no impact. Information technology use may increase in the future allowing other methods and forms of dietary assessment to be used efficiently.
“…The significance of the research works that use Web-based food frequency questionnaires has increased in the last few years [6,23,24,26,29,30] and the validity and reproducibility of Web-based FFQs has also been evaluated [22,25,27,28].…”
Section: Web-based Food Frequency Questionnaires (Web-ffqs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probst et al [26] developed a Web-based FFQ which automated the sequence of questioning that a dietitian usually takes with a client when conducting a diet history interview and they also video-recorded and analyzed the participants' behaviors related to the type of foods appearing in the questionnaires;…”
Section: Web-based Food Frequency Questionnaires (Web-ffqs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as intervieweradministered questionnaires are made in front of the participants, an expert dietitian can be able to recognize nonverbal behavior that potentially may aid in minimizing social desirability bias. As [26] mentions, recognizing that a client is shifting in the chair, touching their face or moving their head around when asked about dessert, for example, may assist in determining the appropriate types of questions to be asked, how they are asked, and whether or not to ask additional probing questions in order to gain more detail.…”
Section: Self-administered Vs Interviewer-administered Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FFQs [22,6,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30], online 24 hour dietary recalls [8,31,32,33,34] and combinations of both FFQs and 24HDRs [35,36,37,38]. A few similar reviews or states-of-the-art are found in the literature [39,40,1,41].…”
Objective: In this paper we aim to provide a general view of reported software tools and made and the works reported. Finally, some works that apply innovative technologies are outlined and the future trends for automating questionnaires in nutrition are identified and described as conclusions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.