2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-0978-0_40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Surveillance for Violence Detection Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pseudo-optical flow was obtained by subtracting two adjacent frames [57]. Given a sequence of frames ( f 0 .…”
Section: Training Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pseudo-optical flow was obtained by subtracting two adjacent frames [57]. Given a sequence of frames ( f 0 .…”
Section: Training Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Utilizing features through handcrafted feature descriptors and providing them to a deep classifier is another method to build deep models [18]. [19]. Authors uses pre-trained ResNet-50 architecture to extract necessary features from videos, and send them to ConvLSTM block.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test is done with 10 frames per sequence and 4 sequences per second (non-overlapping), that is, 40 FPS. The time is taken to classify a given video input of length 1 s is 0.923 s. [17] 82.9 ± 0.14% − 81.3 ± 0.21% MoSIFT+KDE+Sparse Coding [9] 94.3 ± 1.68% − 89.05 ± 3.26 Deniz et al [25] 90.1 ± 0% 98.0 ± 0.22% − Gracia et al [26] 82.4 ± 0.4% 97.8 ± 0.4% − Substantial derivative [18] − 96.89 ± 0.21% 85.43 ± 0.21% Bilinski et al [27] 93.4% 99% 96.4% Three streams + LSTM [15] 93.9% − − SELayer-3D CNN (C3D) [28] 99.0% − 98.08% 3D CNN [22] 98.3% 100% 97.0% [29] 96.33% 100% 95.71% [30] 89.0% -92.0%…”
Section: Accuracy Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%