2020
DOI: 10.9779/pauefd.707224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Video Tabanlı Dönüt Uygulamalarının Algılanan Dönüt Kalitesi Üzerine Etkisinin İncelenmesi

Abstract: This study aims to examine the effect of video-based feedback on perceived feedback quality and determine students' opinions about the video feedback practice. This study was carried out for 10 weeks with 38 undergraduate students from Computer Education and Instructional Technology department in a public university in the "Information Security and Ethics" course. A convergent parallel mixed-methods study design was adopted in this study. In the first 6 weeks of the study, students in the experimental group re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bu sayede incelenen nesneye yönelik olumlu veya olumsuz tutumun derecesi kolaylıkla temsil edilebilir. Alan yazında teknoloji kullanımı bağlamında öğretmen tutumları (Demirci Güler & Irmak, 2018;Ursavaş et al 2014), video izleme ve dönüt almanın motivasyonel yönleri (Yiğit & Seferoğlu, 2021)…”
Section: Video Kaydına İlişkin öğRetmen Tutumlarıunclassified
“…Bu sayede incelenen nesneye yönelik olumlu veya olumsuz tutumun derecesi kolaylıkla temsil edilebilir. Alan yazında teknoloji kullanımı bağlamında öğretmen tutumları (Demirci Güler & Irmak, 2018;Ursavaş et al 2014), video izleme ve dönüt almanın motivasyonel yönleri (Yiğit & Seferoğlu, 2021)…”
Section: Video Kaydına İlişkin öğRetmen Tutumlarıunclassified
“…Recent research has reported both positive and negative aspects of screencast feedback in this respect, though. Concerning the positive aspects, the findings revealed higher levels of perceived www.mojet.net engagement (Crook et al, 2012), feedback quality (Yigit & Seferoglu, 2021), interpersonal communication (Cunningham & Link, 2021) and cognitive and social presence (Edwards et al, 2012); clearer (Crook et al, 2012), more detailed, personal, (Ali, 2016;Cheng & Li, 2020;Mann, 2015;Ryan et al, 2019), supportive (Ali, 2016;Borup et al, 2015), and timely (Crook et al, 2012) feedback, more incorporation of feedback into works (Cheng & Li, 2020;Ozkul & Ortactepe, 2017) and on the teachers' side with increased efficiency and organization (Borup et al, 2015). However, some negative aspects have also been reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%