Video-Teleconferencing in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology: Ten Years of Experience

Abstract

PurposeThe management of central nervous system tumors is challenging in low- and middle-income countries. Little is known about applicability of twinning initiatives with high-income countries in neuro-oncology. In 2004, a monthly neuro-oncology video-teleconference program was started between King Hussein Cancer Center (Amman, Jordan) and the Hospital for Sick Children (Toronto, Ontario, Canada). More than 100 conferences were held and > 400 cases were discussed. The aim of this work was to assess the sustainability of such an initiative and the evolution of the impact over time.MethodsWe divided the duration in to three eras according to the initial 2 to 3 years of work of three consecutive oncologists in charge of the neuro-oncology program at King Hussein Cancer Center. We retrospectively reviewed the written minutes and compared the preconference suggested plans with the postconference recommendations. Impact of changes on the patient care was recorded.ResultsThirty-three sets of written minutes (covering 161 cases) in the middle era and 32 sets of written minutes (covering 122 cases) in the last era were compared with the initial experience (20 meetings, 72 cases). Running costs of these conferences has dropped from $360/h to < $40/h. Important concepts were introduced, such as multidisciplinary teamwork, second-look surgery, and early referral. Suggestions for plan changes have decreased from 44% to 30% and 24% in the respective consecutive eras. Most recommendations involved alternative intervention modalities or pathology review. Most of these recommendations were followed.ConclusionVideo-teleconferencing in neuro-oncology is feasible and sustainable. With time, team experience is built while the percentage and the type of treatment modifications change. Commitment and motivation helped maintain this initiative rather than availability of financial resources. Improvement in patients’ care was achieved, in particular, with the implementation of a multidisciplinary team and the continuous effort to implement recommendations.

Identifying barriers to treatment of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma in resource‐limited settings: A literature review

“…Ongoing efforts by the global academic and medical communities to advocate for national pediatric cancer registries and pediatric cancer national healthcare plans, and to improve available infrastructure and care delivery through twinning models, planning of healthcare delivery networks, and cooperative national and regional groups, are all mechanisms by which patient outcome may be improved for children with RMS and other childhood cancers requiring complex multidisciplinary care. The successes reported in several centers in UMIC and LMIC, especially with involvement of NGOs for proper resource allocation and infrastructure development, serve as a model for refinement of pediatric cancer care in areas with limited resources.…”

Science and health for all children with cancer

“…On average 4 to 5 patients were discussed during each 1-hour session. The benefits of this interaction quickly became evident for all participants (92)(93)(94)(95)(96). The group conducted a series of research projects together, and found that 17 of 44 (39%) children with high-grade malignant brain tumour cases at KHCC over 10 years had defective mismatch repair (MMR) genes, compared to less than 4% in North America (97,98).…”

Evaluation of the Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Resources Available in Chile

“…Expanding the telemedicine-based collaboration between global highly specialized centers and the Chilean hospitals may represent a promising avenue to facilitate long-distance consultation, provide continuous educational opportunities, and improve management plans. 22 - 24 …”