2008
DOI: 10.1002/bsl.815
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Videoconferencing and forensic mental health in Australia

Abstract: Videoconferencing is in common use in Australian forensic mental health services. It provides opportunities to link remote prisons, courts, and psychiatric clinics with distant specialist services, and enables a range of activities including assessment, treatment and feedback, expert testimony, education, and inter-service planning. These functions are acceptable to patients and clinicians, and in Australia videoconferencing minimizes disruption to small services and their patients, who might otherwise face le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 By 2008, Sullivan et al noted that, "Videoconferencing is in common use in Australian forensic mental health services" and that "videoconferencing technologies are critical to effective forensic mental health services in Australia." 12 In the United States, the assessment of adjudicative competence can involve the use of assessment tools in addition to clinical examination. There have been several reports comparing the validity and satisfaction of both psychiatrists and prisoners when using various assessment tools by videoconferencing or face to face.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…1 By 2008, Sullivan et al noted that, "Videoconferencing is in common use in Australian forensic mental health services" and that "videoconferencing technologies are critical to effective forensic mental health services in Australia." 12 In the United States, the assessment of adjudicative competence can involve the use of assessment tools in addition to clinical examination. There have been several reports comparing the validity and satisfaction of both psychiatrists and prisoners when using various assessment tools by videoconferencing or face to face.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It improves timely access to specialist skills 1,4,9,12,19,20 , reduces costly transportation and escort of prisoners to urban areas and specialist hospitals for assessment, or transport of specialists to correctional facilities 1,7,10,12,19 , reduces unnecessary or inappropriate admission to hospitals 12 , and reduces risk to psychiatrists by allowing them to perform assessments without having to enter prisons or secure hospitals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations