Videoconferencing in the Field: A Heuristic Processing Model

Abstract

This research uses dual-process cognitive theory to describe how people process information differently when it is delivered via videoconference rather than when it is delivered face-to-face. According to this theory, relative to face-to-face communication, people in videoconferences tend to be more influenced by heuristic cues--such as how likeable they perceive the speaker to be--than by the quality of the arguments presented by the speaker. This is due to the higher cognitive demands that videoconferencing places on participants. We report on a field study of medical professionals in which we found differences in information processing as predicted: participants attending a seminar via videoconference were more influenced by the likeability of the speaker than by the quality of the arguments presented, whereas the opposite pattern was true for participants attending in-person. We also found that differences in cognitive load explain these effects. The discussion on the theoretical model and associated findings explains why prior videoconference studies have not consistently found main effects for media. The findings also show that videoconferencing is not like face-to-face communication, despite apparent similarities.computer-mediated communications, videoconferencing, cognitive workload, heuristic systematic model

Video killed the interview star: Does picture-in-picture affect interview performance?

“…PIP is expected to increase self-focused attention, which has been shown to increase cognitive load (Panayiotou & Vrana, 1998;Silvia, 2002;Vallacher, 1978). In general, video communication has been shown to induce higher cognitive load compared with face-to-face (Ferran & Watts, 2008) and audio (Hinds, 1999). Because PIP technology presents more pieces of information to integrate, through increased self-focused attention and attentional distractions, we predict that interviewees will experience increased cognitive load.…”

User satisfaction and user experiences with Access Grid as a medium for social science research: a research note

“…This illusion of co-presence and the comparison with face to face interaction, especially with video-conferencing communication, has been an issue in the literature. Previous research with medical professionals (Ferran and Watts, 2008) found that participants in video-conferencing sessions were more influenced by the likeability of the presenter than the arguments being presented.…”

Exploring the influence of instant messaging and video conferencing on the quality of project communication

“…Therefore, it is environmentally friendly, convenient and good for building relationships (Earon, 2014: 2;Harrin, 2010a). Some disadvantages are signal latency and that it can cause anxiety (Wolfe, 2007: 119-126); delegates must work harder to interpret the information presented in the conference (Ferran & Watts, 2008), and lack of eye contact and appearance consciousness (Benson-Armer & Hsieh, 1997 (Harrin, 2010b).…”