This study investigated the possibility that adenosine receptors modulate the α1‐adrenoceptor‐mediated contractility of human cultured prostatic stromal cells (HCPSC).
The nonselective adenosine receptor agonist, 5′‐N‐ethylcarboxamido‐adenosine (NECA; 10 nM–10 μM), and the A1 adenosine receptor selective agonist, cyclopentyladenosine (CPA; 10 nM–10 μM), elicited significant contractions in HCPSC, with maximum contractile responses of 18±3% and 17±2% reduction in initial cell length, respectively.
In the presence of a threshold concentration of phenylephrine (PE) (100 nM), CPA (1 nM–10 μM) caused contractions, with an EC50 of 124±12 nM and maximum contractile response of 37±4%. The A1 adenosine receptor‐selective antagonist 8‐cyclopentyl‐1,3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX 100 nM) blocked this effect. In the presence of DPCPX (100 nM), NECA (1 nM–10 μM) inhibited contractions elicited by a submaximal concentration of PE (10 μM), with an IC50 of 48±2 nM. The A2A adenosine receptor‐selective antagonist 4‐(2‐[7‐amino‐2‐{furyl}{1,2,4}triazolo{2,3‐α}{1,3,5,}triazin‐5‐yl amino]ethyl)phenol (Zm241385 100 nM) blocked this effect.
In BCECF‐AM (10 μM)‐loaded cells, both CPA (100 pM–1 μM) and NECA (100 pM–10 μM) elicited concentration‐dependent decreases in intracellular pH (pHi), with EC50 values of 3.1±0.3 and 6.0±0.3 nM, respectively. The response to NECA was blocked by Zm241385 (100 nM; apparent pKB of 9.4±0.4), but not by DPCPX (100 nM). The maximum response to CPA was blocked by DPCPX (100 nM), and unaffected by Zm241385 (100 nM).
NECA (10 nM–10 μM) alone did not increase [3H]‐cAMP in HCPSC. In the presence of DPCPX (100 nM), NECA (10 nM–10 μM) caused a concentration dependent increase in [3H]‐cAMP, with an EC50 of 1.2±0.1 μM. This response was inhibited by Zm241385 (100 nM). CPA (10 nM–10 μM) had no effect on cAMP, in the presence or absence of forskolin (1 μM).
These findings are consistent with a role for adenosine receptors in the modulation of adrenoceptor‐mediated contractility in human prostate‐derived cells.
British Journal of Pharmacology (2004) 141, 302–310. doi: