2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0021-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Videolaparoscopic appendectomy: the current outlook

Abstract: Laparoscopic appendectomy offers unquestionable advantages, but it is not yet considered the "gold standard" for appendiceal pathology. Many centers reserve it for selected patients (e.g., obese patients and women suspected of having other pathologies). No randomized trials or metaanalyses have definitively proved its superiority.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is evidence that minimal surgical trauma through laparoscopic approach resulted in significant shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, faster return to daily activities in several settings related with gastrointestinal surgery [6, 7]. However, several retrospective studies [3, 814], several randomized trials [1520] and meta-analyses [21, 22] comparing laparoscopic with open appendectomy have provided conflicting results. Some of these studies have demonstrated better clinical outcomes with the laparoscopic approach [1517, 20, 23], while other studies have shown marginal or no clinical benefits [18, 19, 24–26] and higher surgical costs [4, 19, 24, 25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is evidence that minimal surgical trauma through laparoscopic approach resulted in significant shorter hospital stay, less postoperative pain, faster return to daily activities in several settings related with gastrointestinal surgery [6, 7]. However, several retrospective studies [3, 814], several randomized trials [1520] and meta-analyses [21, 22] comparing laparoscopic with open appendectomy have provided conflicting results. Some of these studies have demonstrated better clinical outcomes with the laparoscopic approach [1517, 20, 23], while other studies have shown marginal or no clinical benefits [18, 19, 24–26] and higher surgical costs [4, 19, 24, 25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies was found in literature like Guller et al, (20) Roviaro et al, (21) , several trials of Ortega et al, (22) ; Ignacio et al, (23) and meta-analyses of Wei et al, (24) ; Sauerland et al, (25) comparing laparoscopic with open appendectomy have provided some conflicting results. Some of these studies have showed a better clinical outcome with the laparoscopic approach, while other studies have shown minor or no clinical benefits and higher cost to preform (26) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] We report our experience with this surgical approach, focusing on some technical details which we have matured during these years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%