1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00188355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Videothoracoscopy

Abstract: Videothoracoscopy is a safe, accurate, minimally invasive, and potentially cost-effective method for the diagnosis and therapeutic management of thoracic trauma patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a well-established technique in acute or delayed setting in traumatized patients with persistent bleeding, air leak, retained haemothorax or empyema [3]. Most Authors recommend that patients should be clinically stable to undergo VATS instead of thoracotomy [4-6]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is a well-established technique in acute or delayed setting in traumatized patients with persistent bleeding, air leak, retained haemothorax or empyema [3]. Most Authors recommend that patients should be clinically stable to undergo VATS instead of thoracotomy [4-6]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VATS is increasingly used as the initial management for posttraumatic RHTX because of its minimally invasive approach. Numerous studies have confirmed its safety and efficacy in the trauma setting, and all have demonstrated equivalent or superior outcomes with VATS compared with thoracotomy or nonoperative management [7, 9, 11–14, 17, 22–27] Although success with delayed VATS has been reported up to 46 days, most studies advocate early thoracoscopic intervention [13]. The precise definition of “early” varies from author to author and has been used to describe VATS that have been performed 2, 3, 5, or even 10 days after initial chest tube placement [7, 11–14, 17, 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%