Interactive Multi-Modal Question-Answering 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-17525-1_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vidiam: Corpus-based Development of a Dialogue Manager for Multimodal Question Answering

Abstract: In this chapter we describe the Vidiam project, which concerns the development of a dialogue management system for multi-modal question answering dialogues as it was carried out in the IMIX project. The approach that was followed is data-driven, that is, corpus-based. Since research in Question Answering Dialog for multi-modal information retrieval is still new, no suitable corpora were available to base a system on. We report on the collection and analysis of three QA dialogue corpora, involving textual follo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper addresses some of the basic research questions in this area. It continues the line of research laid out by a previous paper (van Schooten and op den Akker, 2005), which discusses the range of basic methods a system can use to handle text-based follow-up utterances (FU), that is, follow-up questions (FQ) and other utterances, as uttered by more or less naive, non-expert users. We define an FQ as any utterance that can in some way be interpreted as a question about the subject domain and is related to previous utterances in the dialogue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This paper addresses some of the basic research questions in this area. It continues the line of research laid out by a previous paper (van Schooten and op den Akker, 2005), which discusses the range of basic methods a system can use to handle text-based follow-up utterances (FU), that is, follow-up questions (FQ) and other utterances, as uttered by more or less naive, non-expert users. We define an FQ as any utterance that can in some way be interpreted as a question about the subject domain and is related to previous utterances in the dialogue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In previous work (van Schooten and op den Akker, 2005) we distinguished between ‘black-box’ and ‘open’ QA. The difference between IMIX and Ritel is a good example of a black-box QA versus an open QA.…”
Section: Follow-up Question Handling In Different Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Task completion. The metric of task completion measures the percent of DS completion observed at the end of a user-system dialog (Negi et al, 2009;van Schooten & op den Akker, 2011). This metric is particularly appropriate for task-directed dialogs or chats (e.g., booking a flight, buying an item, and filling an online form).…”
Section: Evaluation Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Dialog precision measures the rate of correct vs. incorrect turns within a conversation P=correctanswerturnsitalictrueanswerturns+italicfalseanswerturns. Dialog recall measures the rate of correct vs. expected correct turns (as per the systems' knowledge) within a conversation R=correctanswerturnsitalictrueanswerturns+italicfalseturns. Dialog accuracy measures the rate of correct turns within a conversation A=correctanswerturnstotalturns. Task completion. The metric of task completion measures the percent of DS completion observed at the end of a user‐system dialog (Negi et al, ; van Schooten & op den Akker, ). This metric is particularly appropriate for task‐directed dialogs or chats (e.g., booking a flight, buying an item, and filling an online form).…”
Section: Evaluation Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%