2018
DOI: 10.25162/gz-2018-0013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vier Jahrzehnte deutschsprachige Geographische Entwicklungsforschung im Spannungsfeld zwischen dialektischem Lernprozess und Zeitgeist

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Altogether, I applied various concepts and theorizations throughout my research, starting from more classic epistemological backgrounds, e.g., action-oriented approaches like vulnerability With this research, I show that a pluralized integration of underrepresented and marginalized subaltern perspectives in the sense of a "geography from the margins" can be beneficial in regard to geographic research, both in regard to scientific outcomes that profit from a broader conceptual bouquet, but also with respect to the criticisms the discipline has faced regarding the debate on post-developmentalism in the subdiscipline of development geography (cf. Rauch 2018;Schlottmann 2018;Schurr and Weichhart 2020). In this connection, the subdiscipline had been accused of reproducing prevalent power asymmetries in current development discourses.…”
Section: Reflections and Research Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Altogether, I applied various concepts and theorizations throughout my research, starting from more classic epistemological backgrounds, e.g., action-oriented approaches like vulnerability With this research, I show that a pluralized integration of underrepresented and marginalized subaltern perspectives in the sense of a "geography from the margins" can be beneficial in regard to geographic research, both in regard to scientific outcomes that profit from a broader conceptual bouquet, but also with respect to the criticisms the discipline has faced regarding the debate on post-developmentalism in the subdiscipline of development geography (cf. Rauch 2018;Schlottmann 2018;Schurr and Weichhart 2020). In this connection, the subdiscipline had been accused of reproducing prevalent power asymmetries in current development discourses.…”
Section: Reflections and Research Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…studies and livelihood approaches, to more recent conceptualizations, e.g., constructivist approaches like the STS-related policy assemblage approach or considerations from economic sociology (cf Rauch 2018)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%