2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(02)00055-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View-based active appearance models

Abstract: AbstractÐWe describe a new method of matching statistical models of appearance to images. A set of model parameters control modes of shape and gray-level variation learned from a training set. We construct an efficient iterative matching algorithm by learning the relationship between perturbations in the model parameters and the induced image errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This single-view approach can be extended to 3D by considering multiple simultaneous views of features [8]. Shape models in several views can be separately estimated to match object appearance [5]; this approach was able to learn a mapping between the low-dimensional shape parameters in each view.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This single-view approach can be extended to 3D by considering multiple simultaneous views of features [8]. Shape models in several views can be separately estimated to match object appearance [5]; this approach was able to learn a mapping between the low-dimensional shape parameters in each view.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of modelling them together like the classic AAMs [8], several methods have focused on using shape models to regularize the local detections like the Constrained Local Models (CLMs) [22], Branch & Bound optimization [2] and tree structured shape models [30]. Instead of using parametric shape models, non-parametric representations of shape constraint include [4] and a series of cascaded pose regression approaches [12,11,6,5].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These can be roughly divided into two categories: 2D view-based and 3D modelbased approaches. Examples of the former include the use of support vector machines (SVM) [16,22], PCA [32], Kernel PCA (KPCA) [8], independent subspace analysis [33], Gabor filters [41,42] and networks [19], active appearance models (AAM) [11], shape-from-shading [9] and 2D geometric heuristics [23], amongst others. Model-based approaches can be tackled from a concise mathematical formulation [15], or if real-time analysis is required, by simplifying the problem using affine transformations [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%