2017 12th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face &Amp; Gesture Recognition (FG 2017) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/fg.2017.113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View-Independent Facial Action Unit Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. As can be observed, our model sets a new benchmark in the problem of multi-view action unit detection by improving with an 14% in F1-score over the baseline approach in the Test set, and it is onpar with the challenge winner [44], under that metric. Furthermore, on the ACC metric, we outperform both the baseline and the challenge winner with an absolute improvement of 15% and 4% respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation On Test Setmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. As can be observed, our model sets a new benchmark in the problem of multi-view action unit detection by improving with an 14% in F1-score over the baseline approach in the Test set, and it is onpar with the challenge winner [44], under that metric. Furthermore, on the ACC metric, we outperform both the baseline and the challenge winner with an absolute improvement of 15% and 4% respectively.…”
Section: Evaluation On Test Setmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Table 7: Results over FERA17 Validation and Test, using F1-score and Accuracy (ACC). Comparison with the baseline approach [46] and the challenge winner [44].…”
Section: Multi-view Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occurrence detection Intensity estimation Amirian et al [8] -0.295 Batista et al [18] 0.506 0.399 He et al [73] 0.507 -Li et al [95] 0.495 -Tang et al [166] 0.574 -Zhou et al [218] -0.445 Baseline [181] 0.452 0.217…”
Section: Teammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acc. 2AFC RMSE ICC PCC [Zhou, et al 2017] MTDN 1080 V 7 6 9 ---0.879 0.446 - [Batista, et al 2017] AUMPNet 1080 V 7 6 9 0.506 ---0.399 - [Li, et al 2017a] multi-AU fusion 1080 V 7 6 9 0.498 0.694 ---- [Tang, et al 2017] VGG 1080 V 7 6 9 0.574 0.778 ---- [Amirian, et al 2017] sparse coding 1080 V 7 6 9 ---0.970 0.295 - [Valstar, et al 2017] CRF or CORF 1080 V 7 6 9 0.452 0.561 0.537 1.403 0.217 0.221…”
Section: F1mentioning
confidence: 99%