2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.10.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

View types and luminance effects on discomfort glare assessment from windows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wienold and Christoffersen [20] proposed 2 000, 4 000 and 6 000 nit as thresholds for 'acceptable', 'just uncomfortable' and 'intolerable glare' respectively. Similarly, Shin, Yun [100] proposes 3 200, 5 600 and 10 000 nit respectively for the same three categories. Even greater values were proposed in [101].…”
Section: Luminancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wienold and Christoffersen [20] proposed 2 000, 4 000 and 6 000 nit as thresholds for 'acceptable', 'just uncomfortable' and 'intolerable glare' respectively. Similarly, Shin, Yun [100] proposes 3 200, 5 600 and 10 000 nit respectively for the same three categories. Even greater values were proposed in [101].…”
Section: Luminancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the value given in the experiments of Shin et al 16 , where on average people perceive the glare from simulated windows as "acceptable", i.e. scored as 2.5 out of 4.5 on their discomfort glare scale.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,12 Investigation of psychological effects of virtual windows is still an ongoing process. Some user perception studies on view and light (quality) aspects of virtual windows have been reported by, e.g., Tuaycharoen and Tregenza 13 which focused on discomfort glare from screen projected images, IJsselsteijn et al 14 , who focused on depth perception cues from screen projected images; de Vries et al 15 , who focused on non-visual effects of "emulated windows" without an image; and Shin et al 16 , who focused on subjective discomfort glare evaluation from a backlit, transparent printed image.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hopkinson emphasizes that high correlation between the predictions and the actual discomfort experienced should not be expected since discomfort glare has several side effects. Pleasant view has, for instance, been found to be an important side effect which makes the observer extend his/hers tolerance for discomfort [6,14,15,21,22]. Several researchers have proposed improvements of the formula for DGI over the years in order to obtain better correspondence with experimentally derived data or better mathematical formulation [15,21,23,24].…”
Section: Daylight Glare Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%