Viewing Focus Groups Through a Critical Incident Lens

Abstract

Scholars often do not describe in detail the complex process of conducting focus groups, including what happens when they take unexpected turns. A critical incident lens provides a framework for better analyzing and understanding what actually happens during focus group sessions. Using a critical incident approach, we examine our experiences of carrying out focus groups about the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine with vaccine-eligible adolescent girls and parents/caregivers of vaccine-eligible adolescent girls in New Mexico. The critical incident lens allowed us to productively explore the context and interactional dynamics of our focus groups and ultimately pushed us to talk through the challenges of conducting and analyzing them. We hope this serves as a call to qualitative researchers to be attentive to the critical incidents in your own research to enrich your analysis and contribute to a broader discussion of the realities of focus group conduct.

General practitioners’ perceptions of population based bowel screening and their influence on practice: a qualitative study

“…Reflexivity was facilitated through an iterative process of analysis, with assumptions underpinning interpretations exposed through comparisons between authors’ interpretations and with existing evidence. Differences were resolved through discussion [36]. Participants were not recontacted or provided with copies of the transcripts for verification, however the authors crosschecked the final thematic analysis with the interviewers who had conducted a separate independent analysis.…”

The Critical Incident Technique: Method or Methodology?

“…Although its origins lie with a program that aimed to determine the critical requirements for behaviors of pilots, the CIT was quickly picked up across a range of disciplines (Butterfield, Borgen, Amundson, & Maglio, 2005), including that of health services research (FitzGerald, Seale, Kerins, & McElvaney, 2008; Wagner, 1950). Today, the tool has been used in a large variety of qualitative studies in the dental sciences (FitzGerald et al, 2008; Santha et al, 2016), nursing sciences (Bradbury-Jones & Tranter, 2008; Clark, Lewis, Bradshaw, & Bradbury-Jones, 2018; Kemppainen, 2000), primary care (Redpath, Stacey, Pugh, & Holmes, 1997; Robinson, Stacy, Spencer, & Bhopal, 1995), sexual health care (Clark et al, 2018), hospital care (Runeson, Enskar, Elander, & Hermeren, 2001; Stålberg, Sandberg, & Söderbäck, 2018; Wendt, Fridlund, & Lidell, 2004), health care management (Amati, Kaissi, & Hannawa, 2018), and to research challenges in conducting health research (Getrich, Bennett, Sussman, Solares, & Helitzer, 2016). It has been used to explore both the views of patients (Björklund & Fridlund, 1999; Peltola, Isotalus, & Åstedt-Kurki, 2018; Redfern & Norman, 1999a, 1999b; Wendt et al, 2004) and of service providers on the quality of provided care (Amati et al, 2018; Griggs, 2010; Redfern & Norman, 1999a, 1999b; Redpath et al, 1997; Runeson et al, 2001; Stålberg et al, 2018).…”

Exploring the Experience of Efl Students Engaged in Asynchronous E-Learning

“…The results of the study are provided under the two research questions and it was segmented into four themes which were seen through a critical incident lens. In this lens, vivid happenings provide a framework for better analyzing and understanding (Getrich et al 2016).…”