2014
DOI: 10.2501/ijmr-2014-050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viewpoint: Mobile Market Research, 2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While Marcus (1995), Watts and Urry (2008) as well as Buscher and Urry (2009) see mobile ethnography as multi-sited and therefore as a walk along ethnographic research, Stickdorn and Zehrer (2009), Segelström and Holmlid (2011) and Stickdorn and Frischhut (2009) follow the concept of self-or auto-ethnography (Coffey, 1999;Alvesson, 2003;Chang, 2008) and claim that the tourist him-or herself collects data without the presence of a researcher. Koschel (2018) states, that the main advantages of mobile ethnography include research in real-time (Stickdorn, Frischhut, & Schmid, 2014;Poynter, Williams & York, 2014), with authentic, spontaneous data collection through video, photo, audio and text, longer spans of field work, a bigger number of cases SIS International Research, 2015), simultaneous and multicultural observations throughout various countries or regions, no bias through the researcher present, an easy capture of emotions, moods and sensations, of everyday life, less cost and time-intensity as well as a possibility or multi-perspectivity. Furthermore it minimizes recall bias (Schwarz, 2007) as it enables researchers to capture both cognitive as well as emotional factors at the same time (Urry, 2007).…”
Section: Mobile Ethnography As An Innovative Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Marcus (1995), Watts and Urry (2008) as well as Buscher and Urry (2009) see mobile ethnography as multi-sited and therefore as a walk along ethnographic research, Stickdorn and Zehrer (2009), Segelström and Holmlid (2011) and Stickdorn and Frischhut (2009) follow the concept of self-or auto-ethnography (Coffey, 1999;Alvesson, 2003;Chang, 2008) and claim that the tourist him-or herself collects data without the presence of a researcher. Koschel (2018) states, that the main advantages of mobile ethnography include research in real-time (Stickdorn, Frischhut, & Schmid, 2014;Poynter, Williams & York, 2014), with authentic, spontaneous data collection through video, photo, audio and text, longer spans of field work, a bigger number of cases SIS International Research, 2015), simultaneous and multicultural observations throughout various countries or regions, no bias through the researcher present, an easy capture of emotions, moods and sensations, of everyday life, less cost and time-intensity as well as a possibility or multi-perspectivity. Furthermore it minimizes recall bias (Schwarz, 2007) as it enables researchers to capture both cognitive as well as emotional factors at the same time (Urry, 2007).…”
Section: Mobile Ethnography As An Innovative Research Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are three main areas of interest (Link et al . 2014;Poynter 2014) . First, there is great interest in so-called 'in the moment' measurement .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another empirical article, Mathur et al (2012) studied the impact of social media usage on consumer purchasing behavior. Further, Poynter (2011) proposed that from a commercial point of view, social media research can be divided into three categories: social media monitoring (business purpose), purposed communities and other form of social media research (e.g. netnography).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%