2003
DOI: 10.1207/s15430421tip4201_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Views from the Classroom: Teachers' Opinions of Statewide Testing Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
142
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 199 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
142
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Although prescribed programs and the increase of standardized testing often results in the narrowing of curriculum and even instructional practices (Abrams, Pedulla, & Madaus, 2003;Holloway, 2001;Madaus, 1988;Miller, 2001), we found these teachers would use collaboration time as a means for discussing instructional strategies and literature related to best practices in education. However, the tension remained over defining curriculum and the freedom of educators to implement instructional strategies they feel most comfortable with as opposed to instruction geared toward a state, federal, or district mandated end.…”
Section: Curriculum and Instruction As An External And Internal Tensionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Although prescribed programs and the increase of standardized testing often results in the narrowing of curriculum and even instructional practices (Abrams, Pedulla, & Madaus, 2003;Holloway, 2001;Madaus, 1988;Miller, 2001), we found these teachers would use collaboration time as a means for discussing instructional strategies and literature related to best practices in education. However, the tension remained over defining curriculum and the freedom of educators to implement instructional strategies they feel most comfortable with as opposed to instruction geared toward a state, federal, or district mandated end.…”
Section: Curriculum and Instruction As An External And Internal Tensionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Research studies involving accountability measures such as end of course testing, cite teaching to the test (Shaver, Cuevas, Lee, and Avalos, 2007), eliminating non-tested material (Abrams, Pedulla, & Madaus, 2003), and minimizing student-centered instruction (Bianchini & Kelly, 2003) as concerns (Donnelly & Sadler, 2009). To better reconcile this difference between beliefs and practice, teachers should understand how components of the PBL strategy encourage reform-based constructivist practices and can increase student performance on high-stakes tests by increasing student gains in cognition, development of skills, independent learning, cooperation, and motivation (Chiappetta & Koballa, 2005;Smith, Powell, & Wood, 1995;Sonmez & Lee, 2003;Weller & Karp-Boss, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers are immediately connected to test-takers and the impacts of IUEE are not limited to end of the course scores, but to lifelong repercussions that determine the university one should attend, the major one is presumably qualified for, and the jobs one can obtain. Regarding national high-stakes testing programs, the bulk of the studies related to teaching and testing come to the conclusion that teachers focus higher attention on previously tested parts (e.g., McMillan, Myran, & Workman 1999;Abrams, Pedulla, & Madaus, 2003;Ballard & Bates, 2008). Some studies end in suggestions for Studies which have acknowledged teachers' power in language testing and their role in the interpretation of the results are limited in number.…”
Section: Language Teachers and Evaluation Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%