2022
DOI: 10.1037/dhe0000384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Views from the middle: Racialized experiences of midlevel student affairs administrators.

Abstract: The continued underrepresentation of student affairs Professionals of Color poses an ongoing challenge to fully realize the supposed values of social justice and inclusion in student affairs. Midlevel student affairs administrators provide a unique experiential lens to better understand organizational culture, critique structures, and challenge existing dominant practices. Using narrative inquiry, this study explored the professional and personal experiences of seven racially minoritized midlevel student affai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Few research studies have focused on Black Women administrators and the ways in which they lead. Rather, studies have focused on the underrepresentation (Flowers, 2003;Harper, 2005;and Townsend, 2021), isolation (Patitu, 2003;Gregory, 2001;and Willis, et al, 2019), and marginalization (Bazner, 2021;Lloyd-Jones, 2014;and Mitchell, et al, 2014) of Black Women in higher education. Limited research also discusses the experiences of Black Women administrators at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), while rarely highlighting their experiences in a positive light at predominantly White institutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Few research studies have focused on Black Women administrators and the ways in which they lead. Rather, studies have focused on the underrepresentation (Flowers, 2003;Harper, 2005;and Townsend, 2021), isolation (Patitu, 2003;Gregory, 2001;and Willis, et al, 2019), and marginalization (Bazner, 2021;Lloyd-Jones, 2014;and Mitchell, et al, 2014) of Black Women in higher education. Limited research also discusses the experiences of Black Women administrators at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), while rarely highlighting their experiences in a positive light at predominantly White institutions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the vast role and responsibility that mid-level administrators play, they tend to be overlooked within the literature, although more studies are focusing on this critical position within higher education administration [6,8,9]. There is significantly less published research detailing the experiences of racially and ethnically minoritized mid-level administrators who may be more likely to advocate for equity and justice, including Latinx/a/o mid-level administrators who work in student affairs divisions [10,11] We utilize the term Latinx/a/o, which includes racial/ethnic heritages from Cuba, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Dominican Republic, Central America, South America, as well as gender inclusive terms that move beyond the gender binary (for a comprehensive review of the evolution of the term Latinx, please see Salinas and Lozano [12]). In citing existing research, we utilize the terms used by the author(s) (e.g., Hispanic, Chicana/o, Latina, and Salvadoran, to name a few).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mid-level administrators are accustomed to fostering effectiveness with limited formal authority and might finesse the processes in place to address equity issues [10]. Cooper and Saunders [17] noted that the most desired skills for mid-level administrators were:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, white people occupied nearly all administrator roles across the campuses we studied. Scholarship, broadly, has also detailed how Staff of Color experience individual and institutional racism at PWIs (Bazner, 2022; Briscoe, 2022). In contrast, white staff’s and administrators’ experiences, often devoid of critical considerations of whiteness, are largely validated and normalized (Ray, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%