Viktimisierung junger Menschen im Internet

Robertz, Frank J.; Oksanen, Atte; Räsänen, Pekka

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-12325-3

Cited by 9 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Victims suffer physical and psychological consequences, such as emotional distress, depression, and anxiety (Gámez-Guadix et al, 2020;Krause et al, 2021;Wachs et al, 2022c). In perpetrators, hate speech leads to increased hatred (Robertz et al, 2016;Ballaschk et al, 2021). Additionally, witnessing hate speech is associated with desensitization, increased prejudice (Soral et al, 2018), and avoidance of inter-group contact (Cervone et al, 2021).…”

Section: A Theoretical Framework For the Study Of Hate Speech In Scho...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hate speech in adolescents: A binational study on prevalence and demographic differences

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Hate speech, or intentional derogatory expressions about people based on assigned group characteristics, has been studied primarily in online contexts. Less is known about the occurrence of this phenomenon in schools. As it has negative consequences for victims, perpetrators, and those who witness it, it is crucial to characterize the occurrence of offline (i.e., in the school) and online hate speech to describe similarities and differences between these two socialization contexts. The present study aimed to investigate the prevalence of hate speech witnessing, victimization, and perpetration, in a sample of 3,620 7–9th graders (51% self-identified as female) from 42 schools in Germany and Switzerland. We found that 67% of the students witnessed hate speech in their school, and 65% witnessed online hate speech at least once in the past 12 months. Approximately 21% of the students self-identified as offline perpetrators and 33% as offline victims, whereas these percentages were lower for online hate speech (13 and 20%, respectively). In both settings, skin color and origin were the most common group references for hate speech (50% offline and 63% online). Offline hate speech mainly came from classmates (88%), unknown sources (e.g., graffiti; 19%), or teachers (12%), whereas online hate speech mostly came from unknown persons (77%). The most frequent forms of offline hate speech were offensive jokes (94%) and the spread of lies and rumors about the members of a specific social group (84%). Significant differences by country, gender, and migration background were observed. Girls reported more offline victimization experiences, less perpetration, and a greater frequency of witnessing hate speech. This difference was larger in magnitude in the online setting. Students in Switzerland reported being exposed to hate speech more often than students in Germany. Students with a migration background reported higher hate speech victimization based on skin color and origin than students without a migration background. The high prevalence of hate speech highlights the need for school-based prevention programs. Our findings are discussed in terms of the practical implications.

show abstract

Section: A Theoretical Framework For the Study Of Hate Speech In Scho...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Hate speech in adolescents: A binational study on prevalence and demographic differences

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hate Speech kann sich verschiedener Formen und Anlässe bedienen (Sprache, Bilder, Memes, Kommentare zu Verbrechen, Proganadavideos, Gewaltszenen in sog. sozialen Netzwerken teilen) 35 .…”

Section: Prävention Von Cybermobbingunclassified

Mobbing im Netz – Digitale Einschüchterung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen

Paulus¹

2022

ergopraxis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Durch die digitalen Medien hat sich das klassische Mobbing erweitert: Täter können anonym bleiben, körperliche Überlegenheit ist nicht notwendig, Nachrichten sind unbegrenzt speicherbar und kaum zurücknehmbar. Cybermobbing hat schwerwiegende Probleme für Opfer bzw. Täter zur Folge und beeinträchtigt deren physische und psychische Gesundheit. Dabei sind präventive Maßnahmen verfügbar. Sie können (Cyber-)Mobbing verhindern und zu einem besseren schulischen und innerfamiliären Klima beitragen.

show abstract

Hate Speech. Aggressionstheoretische und sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze

Wettstein

2021

Hate Speech - Multidisziplinäre Analysen Und Handlungsoptionen

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Viktimisierung junger Menschen im Internet

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Hate speech in adolescents: A binational study on prevalence and demographic differences

Hate speech in adolescents: A binational study on prevalence and demographic differences

Mobbing im Netz – Digitale Einschüchterung bei Kindern und Jugendlichen

Hate Speech. Aggressionstheoretische und sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About