Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils

Lambert, Jean-Jacques; Anderson, Michael A.; Wolpert, James A.

doi:10.3733/ca.v062n04p202

Cited by 24 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Indeed, the results of this study did not show considerable effect of the rootstock in most analysed minerals that generally agree with previous work where there was no significant effect of eight rootstocks on the levels of macronutrients in berries of Cabernet Sauvignon (MIELE et al, 2009). It was also demonstrated that the effect of the rootstock on N change levels was not consistent among sites (LAMBERT et al, 2008). However, the Brazilian rootstocks IAC 313 Tropical and IAC 571-6 Jundiaí favored higher contents of Ca and S and IAC 572 Jales and IAC 571-6 Jundiaí higher of Cu in Niagara Rosada grapes (TECCHIO et al, 2014); the P accumulation showed a significant increase in vines grafted on the Harmony rootstock following a flood treatment (MORALES et al, 2014); skin of Riparia Sauvage showed higher contents of B, Fe and Mn, Berlandieri x Riparia Szilágyi 157 Pécs of Cu, and Vitis berlandieri higher of Zn (FEKETE et al, 2013).…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 79%

Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 2. Effect on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Must

Miele

Rizzon

2017

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

-The interaction between rootstock, scion and the environment may induce different responses to the grapevine physiology and, consequently, to the grape composition. The vineyards of Serra Gaúcha, Brazil, are established in different soil types, each with different morphological and physicochemical attributes. Moreover, the grapevines are grafted onto a diversity of rootstocks. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effect of 15 rootstocks in the composition of the Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) grape must. The following rootstocks were used: Rupestris du Lot, 101-14 Mgt., 3309 C, 420A Mgt., 5BB K, 161-49 C, SO4, Solferino, 1103 P, 99 R, 110 R, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge and Isabel, featuring some genetic diversity altogether. The experimental design was in randomized blocks with 15 treatments, three replicates, 10 vines per plot. The grapes were harvested at maturity for four years, and then crushed for winemaking. Next, the grape musts were centrifuged to separate the solid phase from the liquid phase, which was used for analyses related to sugar, acidity and minerals. The data were submitted to correlation analysis and Principal Component Analysis. The main results from the average of four years show that, in general, the grape musts of the CS/101-14 Mgt., CS/161-49 C, CS/3309 C, CS/Rupestris du Lot and CS/Gravesac combinations had high values of density, total soluble solids, pH and °Brix/titratable acidity ratio, and low titratable acidity, which was high with CS/99 R, CS/110 R, CS/Dogridge and CS/1103 P. Potassium had higher concentrations in the grape musts of CS/SO4 and CS/5BB K. Titratable acidity did not correlate with density and total soluble solids, but positively correlated with yield. Density, total soluble solids, and the concentration of potassium were positively correlated with pH. Index terms: Vitis vinifera, grapevine, grafting, composition, minerals.INTERAÇÃO ENTRE PORTA-ENXERTO E COPA: 2. EFEITO NA COMPOSIÇÃO DO MOSTO DA UVA CABERNET SAUVIGNON RESUMO -A interação entre o porta-enxerto, a copa e o ambiente pode induzir diferentes respostas à fisiologia da videira e, consequentemente, à composição da uva. Os vinhedos da Serra Gaúcha são estabelecidos em diferentes tipos de solo, cada um apresentando propriedades morfológicas e físico-químicas particulares. Além disso, as videiras são enxertadas em uma grande diversidade de porta-enxertos. Portanto, esta pesquisa teve como objetivo determinar o efeito de 15 porta-enxertos na composição do mosto da uva Cabernet Sauvignon (CS). Utilizaram-se os seguintes porta-enxertos: Rupestris du Lot, Mgt. 101-14, C 3309, Mgt. 420A, K 5BB, C 161-49, SO4, Solferino, P 1103, R 99, R 110, Gravesac, Fercal, Dogridge e Isabel, que, juntos, apresentam certa diversidade genética. O delineamento experimental foi em blocos casualizados, com 15 tratamentos, três repetições e 10 plantas por parcela. As uvas, maduras, foram colhidas durante quatro anos e, após, esmagadas para vinificação. Em seguida, os mostos foram centrifugados para separar a fase sólida da líq...

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 79%

Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 2. Effect on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Must

Miele

Rizzon

2017

Rev. Bras. Frutic.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Movement by mass flow is through water movement and nutrients from bulk soil and uptake is driven by leaf transpiration (Wang et al 2006). Diffusion is driven by a concentration gradient near the roots, and root interception is direct contact of nutrients by actively growing shoot tips (Schreiner 2009 (Lambert et al 2008, Wolpert et al 2005.…”

Section: 52: Nutrient Uptakementioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of rootstock on vegetative growth, yield, and fruit composition of Norton grapevines

Harris¹

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Even the largest conductivity values of the lower horizon of San Quirico soils, however, did not reflect strong salinity conditions, but only moderate ones. Moderate salinity nevertheless may limit vine vigor when the rootstock is 420A (Lambert et al, 2008).…”

Section: Study Vineyards and Soil Seriesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The distinction of the soil cover into soil series has proved to be relevant for viticulture in different parts of the world (Costantini et al, 1996;Deloire et al, 2005;Morlat and Bodin, 2006;Costantini et al, 2006a;Lambert et al, 2008); however, the geographic pattern of hydrological functional units inside a vineyard is particularly difficult to predict, not only because of local topography and underlying bedrock, but also of pre-planting operations. In fact, agricultural practices carried out before vineyard planting, namely land levelling, slope reshaping, deep ploughing or ripping, have important consequences on profile characteristics, modifying soil depth, porosity, organic matter content, redox conditions, calcium carbonate accumulation, and relationships between horizons (Costantini, 1992;Costantini et al, 2006b).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relevance of the Lin's and Host hydropedological models to predict grape yield and wine quality

Costantini

Pellegrini

Bucelli

et al. 2009

Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The adoption of precision agriculture in viticulture could be greatly enhanced by the diffusion of straightforward and easy to be applied hydropedological models, able to predict the spatial variability of available soil water. The Lin's and Host hydropedological models were applied to standard soil series descriptions and hillslope position, to predict the distribution of hydrological functional units in two vineyard and their relevance for grape yield and wine quality. A threeyears trial was carried out in Chianti (Central Italy) on Sangiovese. The soils of the vineyards differentiated in structure, porosity and related hydropedological characteristics, as well as in salinity. Soil spatial variability was deeply affected by earth movement carried out before vine plantation. Six plots were selected in the different hydrological functional units of the two vineyards, that is, at summit, backslope and footslope morphological positions, to monitor soil hydrology, grape production and wine quality. Plot selection was based upon a cluster analysis of local slope, topographic wetness index (TWI), and cumulative moisture up to the root limiting layer, appreciated by means of a detailed combined geophysical survey. Water content, redox processes and temperature were monitored, as well as yield, phenological phases, and chemical analysis of grapes. The isotopic ratio δ 13 C was measured in the wine ethanol upon harvesting to evaluate the degree of stress suffered by vines. The grapes in each plot were collected for wine making in small barrels. The wines obtained were analysed and submitted to a blind organoleptic testing.The results demonstrated that the combined application of the two hydropedological models can be used for the prevision of the moisture status of soils cultivated with grape during summertime in Mediterranean climate. As correctly foreseen by the models, the amount of mean daily transpirable soil water (TSW) during the growing season differed con- Both Sangiovese grape yield and quality of wine were influenced by the interaction between TSW content and salinity, sometimes contrary to expectations. Therefore, the studied hydropedological models were not relevant to predict grape yield and wine quality in all the hydrological functional units. The diffusion of hydropedological models in precision viticulture could be boosted considering salinity along with topography and soil hydrological characteristics.

show abstract

Vineyard nutrient needs vary with rootstocks and soils

Cited by 24 publications

References 12 publications

Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 2. Effect on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Must

Rootstock-Scion Interaction: 2. Effect on the Composition of Cabernet Sauvignon Grape Must

Effect of rootstock on vegetative growth, yield, and fruit composition of Norton grapevines

Relevance of the Lin's and Host hydropedological models to predict grape yield and wine quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About