2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Violence-related deaths among people released from incarceration: systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Abstract: Background: People released from incarceration have an increased risk of violence-related death. As deaths from violence are a rare event, meta-analysis is needed to calculate reliable estimates of this risk. We examined the crude mortality rates (CMRs), standardised mortality ratios (SMRs), and predictive factors for violence-related deaths among people released from incarceration. Methods: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science, CINCH, and C… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Values less than zero were rounded to zero. Consistent with previous research [ 37 ], the following factors were considered: type of incarceration facility (i.e., prison, jail, or youth detention), prospective/retrospective design, length of follow-up, geographic location of the study, single-sex samples, and whether subsequent periods of incarceration during follow-up were removed from analysis (i.e., interval censoring).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Values less than zero were rounded to zero. Consistent with previous research [ 37 ], the following factors were considered: type of incarceration facility (i.e., prison, jail, or youth detention), prospective/retrospective design, length of follow-up, geographic location of the study, single-sex samples, and whether subsequent periods of incarceration during follow-up were removed from analysis (i.e., interval censoring).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consistent with previous reviews [ 21 , 37 ], we modified our eligibility criteria by excluding studies from the primary analysis that had fewer than 20 total deaths from suicide or less than 6 months of follow-up. To test the effect of excluding these studies, we conducted a sensitivity analysis that included studies that did not meet these criteria but were otherwise eligible to be included in the review.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by assessing each study for the presence of several methodological standards aimed at addressing the risk of bias across six potential bias domains (selection, information, design-related, analytic, confounding, external validity) 41. Using the approach taken in previous systematic reviews,42 43 we will discuss the possible risk of bias and study quality in text, as well as generate a score summarising each study’s quality by using the proportion of safeguards against bias that each study incorporated.…”
Section: Risk Of Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Так, членовредительство является основной причиной заболеваемости среди заключённых [2]. Люди, освобождённые из мест лишения свободы, подвержены повышенному (в семь раз выше) риску самоубийства [3], а шансы умереть от насилия у них в восемь раз больше, чем у населения в целом [4]. При этом особо высокие показатели различных самоповреждений наблюдается как раз среди убийц [5,6].…”
unclassified