2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Violence, voting & peace: Explaining public support for the peace referendum in Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, therefore, we estimate the augmented version of the baseline equation, that is, Equation () including the spatially lagged dependent variable and IVs, with the use of the generalized spatial two‐stage least‐squares (GS2SLS) estimator. This modeling choice was previously used by Agnew and Shin (2017) and Buonanno, Prarolo, and Vanin (2016) in Italian elections, Vermeulen et al (2020) for voting behavior in Amsterdam, Maza et al (2019) for pro‐independence vote in Catalonia, and Branton, Demeritt, Pulido, and Meernik (2019) for the Peace Treaty referendum in Colombia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, therefore, we estimate the augmented version of the baseline equation, that is, Equation () including the spatially lagged dependent variable and IVs, with the use of the generalized spatial two‐stage least‐squares (GS2SLS) estimator. This modeling choice was previously used by Agnew and Shin (2017) and Buonanno, Prarolo, and Vanin (2016) in Italian elections, Vermeulen et al (2020) for voting behavior in Amsterdam, Maza et al (2019) for pro‐independence vote in Catalonia, and Branton, Demeritt, Pulido, and Meernik (2019) for the Peace Treaty referendum in Colombia.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Public support for negotiated peace has been relatively high in recent years in Colombia, always between 60 per cent and 70 per cent in the years 2004-2016 (see Tellez and Montoya, in this volume; and Observatorio de la democracia, 2017, though citizen confidence in the accords differs across groups and may be shifting, overall. Indeed, as García-Sánchez and Caviedes, as well as Carlin et al (this issue) and others suggest, support for the peace agreement varies widely across regions, partisan lines, exposure to violence, and depending on the specific components of the accords (Branton et al, 2019;Garbiras-Díaz et al, 2019;Tellez, 2019). More recently, public opinion polls suggest that perceptions of progress in the implementation of the accords are negative, with 70 per cent of those interviewed stating that the implementation is not going well (Gallup I and Gallup, 2020: 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Así, a pesar de las dificultades para hablar de un sistema de partidos, sí pueden reconocerse patrones relativamente estables de competencia; especialmente cuando se hace referencia a escenarios de elección dicotómica, como son los segundos turnos presidenciales o el Plebiscito sobre los acuerdos de paz de Colombia de 2016. De hecho, estudios recientes sostienen la existencia de un patrón espacio-temporal, consistente en apoyos para cada una de las posiciones, el cual resulta visible en la presencia de comportamientos estables por municipio, así como también en la evidente regionalización de los resultados (Álvarez Vanegas & Garzón, 2016;Branton, Pulido & Meernik, 2019;Milanese, 2019;2020). Es decir, la fortaleza de cada uno de los candidatos asociados a cada posición no está distribuida de forma espacialmente aleatoria 6 , sino concentrada en aglomeraciones de altas y bajas votaciones 7 .…”
Section: Arraigo Y Fluidez Hacia Un Realineamiento De Los Electorados...unclassified