2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Violent Peers, Network Centrality, and Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration by Young Men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Narayan et al (2014) subsequently found that conflict with a best friend but not with family or a romantic partner at age 16 significantly predicted DV perpetration six years later among males and females (β = .17, p b .05). Ramirez et al (2012) found that identifying with a large network of 13 or more violent peers in adolescence was associated with a 3.76 greater odds of men's DV perpetration in young adulthood compared to having a smaller network of violent peers (p b .001).…”
Section: Adolescent Peer Risksmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Narayan et al (2014) subsequently found that conflict with a best friend but not with family or a romantic partner at age 16 significantly predicted DV perpetration six years later among males and females (β = .17, p b .05). Ramirez et al (2012) found that identifying with a large network of 13 or more violent peers in adolescence was associated with a 3.76 greater odds of men's DV perpetration in young adulthood compared to having a smaller network of violent peers (p b .001).…”
Section: Adolescent Peer Risksmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Only those that reported on longitudinal predictors of DV perpetration and/or victimization were retained, resulting in 25 relevant articles from 14 cohorts. Cohorts with multiple studies include the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health dataset (Add Health) (Cui, Ueno, Gordon, & Fincham, 2013;Gomez, 2011;Halpern, Spriggs, Martin, & Kupper, 2009;Melander, Noel, & Tyler, 2010;Ramirez, Paik, Sanchagrin, & Heimer, 2012;Reingle, Staras, Jennings, Branchini, & Maldonado-Molina, 2012), the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development (CSDD) (Lussier, Farrington, & Moffitt, 2009;Theobald & Farrington, 2012), the Christchurch Health and Development Study (CHDS) (Fergusson, Bowden, & Horwood, 2008;Woodward, Fergusson, & Horwood, 2002), the Dunedin Multidisciplinary Health and Development Study (DMHDS) (Ehrensaft, Moffitt, & Caspi, 2004;Magdol, Moffit, Caspi, & Silva, 1998), the Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Risk and Adaptation (MLSRA, formerly Minnesota Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children) (Linder & Collins, 2005;Narayan, Englund, Carlson, & Egeland, 2014), the Oregon Youth Study (OYS) (Capaldi, Dishion, Stoolmiller, & Yoerger, 2001;Kerr & Capaldi, 2011), and the Rochester Youth Development Study (RYDS) (Ireland & Smith, 2009;Smith, Ireland, Park, Elwyn, & Thornberry, 2011). Table 1 presents a summary of the studies that met the inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Classification Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations