1979
DOI: 10.1016/0147-9571(79)90084-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Viral intestinal infections of animals and man

Abstract: The extensive use of negative staining techniques and electron microscopy in diagnostic centers has resulted in a dramatic increase in the number of reported viral enteric infections in man and animals in the last 10 yr. Enteric infection due to adenoviruses, astroviruses, coronaviruses, paramyxoviruses, parvoviruses, picornaviruses (caliciviruses), rotaviruses as well as some unidentified viral particles are described. The brief literature review on each of these virus families is supplemented with clinical c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27 Detection of the pleomorphic coronavirus particles in clinical specimens, such as respiratory secretions and stools, was initially done by DEM, although failure to preserve surface projections and the presence of particles that morphologically resemble coronaviruses make DEM less suitable for precise identification of coronavirus-positive or -negative specimens. 10,11 Prior investigations confirmed that when fecal samples containing BCV or TCV were examined by DEM coronavirus particles were usually widely spaced and the background heavily contaminated with debris. 3,5 Fringed particles that could be mistaken for coronaviruses were frequently observed, particularly in cases of specimens obtained from diarrheic turkey poults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…27 Detection of the pleomorphic coronavirus particles in clinical specimens, such as respiratory secretions and stools, was initially done by DEM, although failure to preserve surface projections and the presence of particles that morphologically resemble coronaviruses make DEM less suitable for precise identification of coronavirus-positive or -negative specimens. 10,11 Prior investigations confirmed that when fecal samples containing BCV or TCV were examined by DEM coronavirus particles were usually widely spaced and the background heavily contaminated with debris. 3,5 Fringed particles that could be mistaken for coronaviruses were frequently observed, particularly in cases of specimens obtained from diarrheic turkey poults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coronaviruses are difficult to identify in negatively stained preparations because they are very pleomorphic and the peplomers are lost during processing of clinical specimens. 10,11,14 It is difficult to distinguish coronavirus particles from cell artifacts such as parts of nuclear or cytoplasmic membranes and other fringed bodies 10 Several immunoelectron microscopy (IEM) . methods for detecting enteric coronaviruses are more sensitive than conventionnal DEM.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, small CVLPs were observed in the process of budding-off from larger fringed particles by a narrow stalk. Coronavirus-like particles also tend to exclude the negative stain, whereas nonspecific membrane profiles are penetrated by stain (Eugster and Sneed, 1980). Third, CVLPs were noted to be morphologically different from nonspecific membranes.…”
Section: Complement-like Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thin sectioning and negatively stained transmission electron microscopy was performed as described [4,6]. The effects of lipid solvents, nucleic acid determination, heat and acid stability, and the effect of divalent cations were studied [2].…”
Section: Virus Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%