2010
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.08.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virally Infected Mouse Liver Endothelial Cells Trigger CD8+ T-Cell Immunity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, coculture with antigen-specific CD8 T cells did not impair MCMV replication in LSEC as efficiently as coculture with mDC, although MCMV-infected LSEC may activate antigen- specific CD8 T cells (42). Our results are consistent with in vivo observations that the killing of MCMV-infected cells and viral control by CD8 T cells may be a relatively inefficient process due to MCMV immune-evasive genes (53,54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Interestingly, coculture with antigen-specific CD8 T cells did not impair MCMV replication in LSEC as efficiently as coculture with mDC, although MCMV-infected LSEC may activate antigen- specific CD8 T cells (42). Our results are consistent with in vivo observations that the killing of MCMV-infected cells and viral control by CD8 T cells may be a relatively inefficient process due to MCMV immune-evasive genes (53,54).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…In addition, EC have recently been identified as sites of virus latency (65), and at least liver EC are able to directly stimulate a cytotoxic T-cell response (36). Using MCMV-⌬M94 constructs for conditional gene expression, we noticed substantial differences in the abilities of EC and Hc to activate a CD8 ϩ T-cell response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…ϩ T-cell response via cross presentation against MCMV infection (36). In addition to EC, other cell types seem to contribute to CD8 ϩ T-cell stimulation, as antigen expression in most infected cells led to a stronger T-cell response than expression in infected EC only.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed such a strategy previously for the antigenic IE1 peptide of mCMV (79). We are not the first to have generated a recombinant mCMV that specifies SIINFEKL as a reporter peptide, but our concept differs in that mCMV-SIINFEKL, unlike the mCMV-Ova viruses (43,80), does not ectopically express the foreign protein ovalbumin as the source for the peptide. Instead, the nonessential but abundantly synthesized viral protein gp36.5/m164, an ER-resident type I glycoprotein expressed in the early (E) phase of the viral replicative cycle, was used as a carrier protein in which the 9-codon sequence of the D d -restricted immunodominant intrinsic peptide 167-AG PPRYSRI-175 (33, 35, 39) (amino acid positions are given relative to the start site of the primary translation product, p36) was replaced with the 8-codon sequence of SIINFEKL or, in the controls, SIINFEKA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%