2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5004687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virial coefficients of anisotropic hard solids of revolution: The detailed influence of the particle geometry

Abstract: We provide analytical expressions for the second virial coefficients of differently shaped hard solids of revolution in dependence on their aspect ratio. The second virial coefficients of convex hard solids, which are the orientational averages of the mutual excluded volume, are derived from volume, surface, and mean radii of curvature employing the Isihara-Hadwiger theorem. Virial coefficients of both prolate and oblate hard solids of revolution are investigated in dependence on their aspect ratio. The influe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These hard-particle virial coefficients are expected to increase with the volume of the particle, here determined by L . Comparing with theoretical calculations for hard spherocylinders, 64 there is expected to be a L 2 dependence, as appears to be the case in Figure 6 . Second virial coefficients for cylinders with various aspect ratios as a function of the interaction strength, βϵ , are shown in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Second Virial Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These hard-particle virial coefficients are expected to increase with the volume of the particle, here determined by L . Comparing with theoretical calculations for hard spherocylinders, 64 there is expected to be a L 2 dependence, as appears to be the case in Figure 6 . Second virial coefficients for cylinders with various aspect ratios as a function of the interaction strength, βϵ , are shown in Figure 7 .…”
Section: Second Virial Coefficientsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…We consider a collection of N c hard superballs in a volume V , each superball having a volume v sb , surface area s sb and surface integrated mean curvature [31] c sb . The second virial coefficient (B 2 ) for hard particles is given by the orientationally averaged excluded volume between two particles [32], and for a suspension of monodisperse convex particles (hence for superballs with m ≥ 2) in a fluid state reads [33,34]…”
Section: Fluid Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite a fairly common practice to analyze molecular interactions by means of virial coefficients, there is no quantitative relationship between the intermolecular interaction potential and the virial coefficients with the order higher than the second one, A 2 . The second virial coefficient A 2 can be determined by means of the total pair interaction potential W , defined within the McMillan–Mayer theory for cylindrical particles as ,, , where a 1 0 is the activity of the pure solvent, k B is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, r is the interprotein center-to-center distance, and a is the particle radius. The lower integration limit is taken as 2­( a + d ) + δ where d is the thickness of the surface charge layer and δ is the thickness of the protein bound water layer, which is usually chosen to be 3 Å …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%