2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-27776-7_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Architecture Mapping: A SystemC Based Methodology for Architectural Exploration of System-on-Chip Designs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are a number of architectural exploration environments, such as (Metro)Polis (Balarin et al, 1997(Balarin et al, , 2003, Mescal (Mihal et al, 2002), and Milan (Mohanty and Prasanna, 2002), and various SystemC-based environments like the work of Kogel et al (2003), that facilitate flexible system-level performance evaluation by providing support for mapping a behavioural application specification to an architecture specification. In Artemis, we try to push the separation of modelling application behaviour and modelling architectural constraints at the system level to even greater extents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are a number of architectural exploration environments, such as (Metro)Polis (Balarin et al, 1997(Balarin et al, , 2003, Mescal (Mihal et al, 2002), and Milan (Mohanty and Prasanna, 2002), and various SystemC-based environments like the work of Kogel et al (2003), that facilitate flexible system-level performance evaluation by providing support for mapping a behavioural application specification to an architecture specification. In Artemis, we try to push the separation of modelling application behaviour and modelling architectural constraints at the system level to even greater extents.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several attempts being made to address this issue, such as in the Metropolis (Balarin et al, 2003) and Milan frameworks (Mohanty and Prasanna, 2002), the work of (Peng et al, 2002), and in the context of SystemC (e.g., Kogel et al, 2003). In Peng et al (2002), for example, a methodology is proposed in which architectureindependent specification models are transformed (i.e., refined) into architecture models to facilitate architectural exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in our introduction, there are various related architectural exploration environments (e.g., [7,13,24,27,35]) that, like Sesame, also facilitate flexible system-level performance evaluation by providing support for mapping a behavioral application specification to an architecture specification. In Gries [18], an excellent survey is presented of various methods, tools and environments for early design space exploration.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fair number of promising system-level simulation-based exploration environments have been proposed in recent years, such as Metropolis [6], MESH [13], Milan [27], Sesame [14,31], and various SystemC-based environments like GRACE++ [24]. These environments typically facilitate efficient and flexible performance evaluation of embedded systems architectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a fair number of system-level simulation-based exploration environments have been proposed, such as Metropolis [2], GRACE++ [3], Koski [4], and our own Sesame [5] framework. The Sesame modeling and simulation framework aims at efficient system-level design space exploration of embedded multimedia systems, allowing rapid performance evaluation of different architecture designs, application to architecture mappings, and hardware/software partitionings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%