2020
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2020.2991170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Dimensionality of Hyperspectral Data: Use of Multiple Hypothesis Testing for Controlling Type-I Error

Abstract: Estimating the number of materials present in a scene is the fundamental step in many hyperspectral remote sensing applications. The virtual dimensionality (VD) estimates the number of spectrally distinct materials in the hyperspectral data. The VD is generally considered as the number of signal sources under binary hypothesis, based on the Neyman-Pearson detection criteria. We observe that the hypothesis testing procedure used in many approaches is prone to inflated Type-I (false positive) error. This is due … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We select four sparse unmixing methods and a DL method to compare with the proposed IVIU-Net, including SUnSAL [20], CLSUnSAL [55], RSU [56], SUnSAL-TV [22] and Deep Autoencoder(DAE) [57]. On the tagged dataset, we refer to the method in [58] to estimate the number of endmembers, then initialize the DAE algorithm using the endmember extracted by VCA [15] and the real endmember respectively, and use it as a comparison algorithm separately. All comparison algorithms are published or provided privately by the author, and we try our best to make the results the best.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We select four sparse unmixing methods and a DL method to compare with the proposed IVIU-Net, including SUnSAL [20], CLSUnSAL [55], RSU [56], SUnSAL-TV [22] and Deep Autoencoder(DAE) [57]. On the tagged dataset, we refer to the method in [58] to estimate the number of endmembers, then initialize the DAE algorithm using the endmember extracted by VCA [15] and the real endmember respectively, and use it as a comparison algorithm separately. All comparison algorithms are published or provided privately by the author, and we try our best to make the results the best.…”
Section: Comparison Of Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, NU-BGBM, rNMF, DMBU, and the proposed approach were built based on NLMM, which considers additional interactions. In addition, the identification of endmember numbers is also an important part of blind unmixing [64], [65]. In this study, we employed the HySIME algorithm [66] to identify the number of endmembers in all experiments.…”
Section: B Description Of Other Comparison Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the synthetic dataset, R is set to the quantity of endmembers in the synthetic dataset. In the real experiments, the Virtual Dimensionality (VD) [46], [47] and the HySime algorithm [48] for Minimum Error Hyperspectral Signal Subspace Identification are used to determine the number of distinct materials present in the real HSIs. We will analyze and explore the impact of these parameters (µ, λ and ξ) on the algorithm performance in section V.…”
Section: B Implementation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%