2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual fatigue diagnostics of wake-affected wind turbine via Gaussian Process Regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is possibly related to the worse performance of the model under wake. Avendaño-Valencia et al (2021) worked in this direction, concluding that the fatigue life of OWTs under freestream inflow can be quite distinct from OWTs under wake (Avendaño-Valencia et al, 2021). This can be further verified by inspecting Fig.…”
Section: Fatigue Rate (Del) Estimationmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is possibly related to the worse performance of the model under wake. Avendaño-Valencia et al (2021) worked in this direction, concluding that the fatigue life of OWTs under freestream inflow can be quite distinct from OWTs under wake (Avendaño-Valencia et al, 2021). This can be further verified by inspecting Fig.…”
Section: Fatigue Rate (Del) Estimationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Similarly, Avendaño-Valencia et al (2021) has used Gaussian process regression time series modelling to evaluate the influence so-called EOPs (environmental and operational parameters) have on the features of the vibration response of the wind turbine blades. Also applied to estimate the blade root flapwise damage equivalent loads (DELs), Schröder's (2020) work has emphatically demonstrated how a surrogate model based on ANNs outperforms other surrogate models, such as polynomial chaos expansion and quadratic response surface, in computational time, model accuracy and robustness, further applying it to connect wind farm loads to turbine failures (Schröder, 2020).…”
Section: Use Of Machine Learning In (Offshore) Windmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ziegler et al 10 present a methodology for wind turbines that opts for a regression based prediction when measured data are available at the location of interest as an alternative to the updated finite element model approach discussed previously. Avendano-Valencia et al 11 use Gaussian process (GP) regression to provide a probabilistic fatigue estimate also based on the DEL concept, predicting the equivalent load using readily available data such as wind speed and turbulence intensity. Virtual loads monitoring of aircraft have used global parameters such airspeed and local measurements of, for example, acceleration to build regression models for predicting loads elsewhere.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although presented only marginally (within selected 10‐min intervals), Noppe et al 8 investigated the thrust load time‐series via ANN based surrogates, utilizing both high‐fidelity aeroelastic simulations and high frequency (1Hz) SCADA from field experiments earlier. Avendaño‐Valencia et al 9 proposed a surrogate model based on Gaussian Process Regression with Bayesian hyperparameters calibration to estimate short‐term fatigue Damage Equivalent Loads output of the higher fidelity aero‐servo‐elastic simulations. Lastly, Tarpø et al 10 implemented supervised principal component analysis (PCA) to estimate strain response on an offshore turbine and concluded that the developed virtual sensors had higher reliability and robustness compared to the actual strain gauges for that monitoring campaign.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%