2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.61575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Formation Method for Precise Autonomous Absolute Orbit Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where the dynamics of the state vector are described by ( 3) and (10). The control input, on the other hand, is set to…”
Section: Mpc Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where the dynamics of the state vector are described by ( 3) and (10). The control input, on the other hand, is set to…”
Section: Mpc Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many contributions on autonomous absolute orbit keeping for LEO satellites have been introduced over the last few decades [6][7][8][9]. Among the many, formation flying techniques were used for absolute orbit control in [10], where the spacecraft had to maintain its ground track close to a reference trajectory computed as the orbit of a virtual chief satellite. A specific set of variables was used to parameterize the relative motion and linear and quadratic optimal regulators were employed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the mentioned strategy successfully solved the burden of daily ground operations, there are limited resources in the ground station of an extensive satellite network to meet frequent satellite operations requirements. Thus, an onboard autonomous orbit control strategy has been presented by Bolandi and Abrehdari [13], Florio et al [14], Garulli et al [15], De Florio et al [16], and Zhong and Gurfil [17]. The autonomous orbit control of low-orbit satellite includes orbit determination, orbit, and attitude control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constantly evolving notion of spacecraft formation provides the means to enhance mission reliability and adaptability to changing mission requirements by distributing major tasks, which used to be commonly handled by a single monolithic unit, among several smaller spacecraft, therefore leading to technological and economic benefits such as: mission robustness against unit loss by reconfiguring the formation with the remaining satellites, weight reduction in launch payload for tight formation missions, miniaturization and mass production of spacecraft, etc. Moreover, autonomy poses several advantages over traditional manual control, such as the reduction of ground-based orbit maintenance, planning and scheduling by knowing the future position and velocity of the spacecraft at any time and lower propellant usage by continuously maintaining the orbit at its highest level (De Florio et al, 2014). Several autonomous formation flying missions designed to demonstrate the feasibility of this technology are currently deployed while others are still under development, for example, TacSat2 (Plam et al, 2008), Demeter (Lamy et al, 2009), TanDEM-X (Montenbruck & Kahle, 2008) and PRISMA (D'Amico et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%