Virtual geriatric clinics and the COVID-19 catalyst: a rapid review

Abstract

Background During the current COVID-19 health crisis virtual geriatric clinics have become increasingly utilised to complete outpatient consultations, although concerns exist about feasibility of such virtual consultations for older people. The aim of this rapid review is to describe the satisfaction, clinic productivity, clinical benefit, satisfaction and costs associated with the virtual geriatric clinic model of care. Methods A rapid review of PubMed, MEDLINE and CINAHL databases was conducted up to April 2020. Two independent reviewers extracted the information. Four subdomains were focused on: satisfaction with the virtual geriatric clinic, clinic productivity, clinical benefit to patients, costs and any challenges associated with the virtual clinic process. Results Nine studies with 975 patients met our inclusion criteria. All were observational studies. Seven studies reported patients were satisfied with the virtual geriatric clinic model of care. Productivity outcomes included reports of cost-effectiveness, savings on transport, and improved waiting list metrics. Clinical benefits included successful polypharmacy reviews, and reductions in acute hospitalisation rates. Varying challenges were reported for both clinicians and patients in eight of the nine studies. Hearing impairments and difficulty with technology added to anxieties experienced by patients. Physicians missed the added value of a thorough physical examination and had concerns about confidentiality. Conclusion Virtual geriatric clinics demonstrate evidence of productivity, benefit to patients, cost effectiveness and patient satisfaction with the treatment provided. In the current suboptimal pandemic climate, virtual geriatric clinics may allow Geriatricians to continue to provide an outpatient service, despite the encountered inherent challenges.

The Effects of COVID-19 Among the Elderly Population: A Case for Closing the Digital Divide

“…This has been further shown during the pandemic, as the group with the highest adoption of telemedicine use has been those aged 20–44, despite the fact that the elderly population generally have the highest yearly number of doctor and hospital visits ( 53 , 54 ). Although there have been some recent efforts to create virtual geriatric clinics to support the elderly during the pandemic, research has shown these have had varying success, and have been met with a variety of problems related to difficulties with technology use ( 55 ). Therefore, despite being the group most in need of telehealth solutions, the elderly community has benefited from their implementation the least.…”

An evidence‐based synthesis of instructional reading and spelling procedures using telepractice: A rapid review in the context of COVID‐19

“…During the COVID-19 pandemic, numerous health-related rapid reviews have been published. Examples include rapid reviews of clinical swallowing assessments (Bolton et al 2020), virtual geriatric clinics for outpatient consultations (Murphy et al 2020) and palliative care and hospice services (Etkind et al 2020). These reasons justify the authors' use of the rapid review method for the current study.…”

“…2020), virtual geriatric clinics for outpatient consultations (Murphy et al . 2020) and palliative care and hospice services (Etkind et al . 2020).…”

The Impact of COVID-19 on Hip Fracture Management in a Tertiary Referral Hospital; Pearls and Pitfalls.

“…The initiation of telemedicine clinics reduced the risk of transmission of the virus, while also ensuring adequate provision of outpatient care. Virtual clinics have grown in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic (17) and are largely touted as an e cient means of delivering care to fracture clinic patients and to older adults (18,19). Data from patient cohort demonstrates satisfactory outcomes from the clinic with 64% of the cohort being discharged without the need for further follow-up.…”