2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101765
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual immersion in nature and psychological well-being: A systematic literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
31
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The qualitative findings also supported the quantitative findings regarding presence, indicating that participants felt like “being in” the virtual world, and in some few cases even completely loose the sense of reality (i.e., forgetting they were in the laboratory). Altogether, these findings indicate an improvement of the virtual conditions compared to those used in previous studies, which typically report adverse effects of virtual exposure (Alkahtani et al 2019 ; Browning et al 2020a , b ; Calogiuri et al 2018 ; Frost et al 2022 ; Mostajeran et al 2021 ). In the present study, both VR conditions were associated with low levels of cybersickness symptoms, as indicated by the similar SSQ ratings in the VR conditions as compared to control, but also by the fact that only few participants mentioned experiencing cybersickness (either in form of dizziness or impaired postural stability) in the qualitative reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The qualitative findings also supported the quantitative findings regarding presence, indicating that participants felt like “being in” the virtual world, and in some few cases even completely loose the sense of reality (i.e., forgetting they were in the laboratory). Altogether, these findings indicate an improvement of the virtual conditions compared to those used in previous studies, which typically report adverse effects of virtual exposure (Alkahtani et al 2019 ; Browning et al 2020a , b ; Calogiuri et al 2018 ; Frost et al 2022 ; Mostajeran et al 2021 ). In the present study, both VR conditions were associated with low levels of cybersickness symptoms, as indicated by the similar SSQ ratings in the VR conditions as compared to control, but also by the fact that only few participants mentioned experiencing cybersickness (either in form of dizziness or impaired postural stability) in the qualitative reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Estimation of required sample size was performed using the G*Power software, based on expected effect size for negative affect, which previous research has found to be a sensitive measure for detecting impacts of virtual nature (Frost et al 2022 ; Yeo et al 2020 ). The expected effect size was set as medium (f = 0.25), as previous research suggests that the typical effect of real green exercise on negative affect is equivalent of a medium effect size or larger (Lahart et al 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present pilot study aimed to analyze the effects of a 360°-video-based VR nature intervention for people confined during the COVID-19 pandemic. Given the limited literature regarding the use of VR exposure to nature [ 50 ] and the consequences that confinement has on mental health and well-being (e.g., [ 1 , 5 , 7 ]), studies on the benefits of virtual exposure to nature in people who do not have access to natural environments are needed. The intervention—called STONE “Staying in TOuch with NaturE”—is based on previous evidence that has shown the restorative effect of interventions that include natural environments [ 15 ] and VR's capacity to induce and promote positive emotions and well-being [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to other studies with 360-degree videos of VR in natural environments [ 36 , 62 ], we did not find a significant increase in positive affect or well-being. A recent systematic review conducted by Frost et al [ 50 ] found that a decrease in negative affect (associated with restoration and mental fatigue recovery) is more commonly impacted by virtual immersion in nature than positive affect. In this regard, authors point out that factors that may be underlying the limited changes in positive affect during a VR nature exposure are cyber sickness, gait instability, or frustration regarding usability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If only those studies that used an HMD are considered, the results are less conclusive and often show non-significant differences (Knaust et al, 2021 ). Another systematic review was also undertaken that only included virtual natural environments presented on immersive hardware (HMD, or Cave Automatic Virtual Environment) (Frost et al, 2022 ). Both reviews concluded that, based on the predominantly non-significant results, better powered and designed research trials are needed to draw clear conclusions regarding the efficacy of monoscopic 360-degree nature videos compared with real nature experiences (Browning et al, 2020 ; Frost et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%