2018
DOI: 10.1080/10586458.2017.1422160
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Knot Cobordism and Bounding the Slice Genus

Abstract: In this paper, we compute the slice genus for many low-crossing virtual knots. For instance, we show that 1295 out of 92800 virtual knots with 6 or fewer crossings are slice, and that all but 248 of the rest are not slice. Key to these results are computations of Turaev's graded genus, which we show extends to give an invariant of virtual knot concordance. The graded genus is remarkably effective as a slice obstruction, and we develop an algorithm that applies virtual unknotting operations to determine the sli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They include the index polynomial of Heinrich [14] and the graded genus of Turaev [29]. Boden, Chrisman, and Gaudreau [4] have used these invariants and others to compute or estimate the slice genus of a very large number of the 92800 virtual knots of 6 crossing or less (as given in Green's table [13]).…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They include the index polynomial of Heinrich [14] and the graded genus of Turaev [29]. Boden, Chrisman, and Gaudreau [4] have used these invariants and others to compute or estimate the slice genus of a very large number of the 92800 virtual knots of 6 crossing or less (as given in Green's table [13]).…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exact values of g * are obtained by constructing a cobordism which attains a lower bound given by s, s 1 , or s 2 . Upper bounds on g * are obtained by constructing a cobordism of the given genus, and employing the fact that half the crossing number bounds the slice genus of a knot from above (as in the classical case) [4]. Shortly after posting a previous version of this paper to the arXiv the author learned of the work of Boden, Chrisman, and Gaudreau in which they compute or estimate the slice genus of a very large number of the virtual knots of 6 crossings or less [4,5].…”
Section: Computation and Estimation Of The Slice Genusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper studies the concordance invariance of the affine index polynomial [19], denoted P K (t). This invariant is also called the writhe polynomial, W K (t), in the context of Gauss diagrams, see [1] where the W notation is used and where a related polynomial is denoted by P K (t) (there should be no confusion). In this paper we work in the context of virtual knot and link diagrams and extend the definitions in [19] to an affine index polynomial for links (with affine labeling as described in the body of the paper).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 4 we re-develop the affine index polynomial [19] extending its definition to labeled links and proving that it is a concordance invariant of virtual knots and links. The reader should note that concordance invariance of the affine index polynomial for knots is proved in [1] by Gauss diagram techniques. In the present work we use affine labelings of the knot and link diagrams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we consider two related questions: (1) how does one draw a Seifert surface for a homologically trivial knot in a thickened surface Σ × [0, 1], where Σ is compact, connected, and oriented, and (2) how can such surfaces be employed in the study of virtual knots? These issues arise, for example, in the computation of the directed signature functions [1] of Boden, Gaudreau, and the author.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%