2011
DOI: 10.11120/ital.2011.10010012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Virtual Learning Environments for mobile learning: Constrained by infrastructural and sociological boundaries?

Abstract: This paper describes and discusses two issues which limit the delivery of mobile learning from assisting in disseminating course and module information to higher education students. The concept of delivering information to support learning is designed to augment their engagement with their subject areas and ultimately enhance their learning experience by allowing for increased flexibility in their access to learning materials. The paper concentrates on both the infrastructural and sociological issues associate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of the rapid pace of technological innovation, the available tools still pose barriers to mobile learning ( Figure 4 ), key barriers can be categorized into three groups, which are 1) technology-related problems ( Frank and Kapila, 2017 ; Jarrahi et al., 2017 ; Masters et al., 2016 ; Zhang et al., 2016 ), 2) basic skills in using mobile devices ( Crane et al., 2011 ; Jeno et al., 2017 ; Mori and Harada, 2010 ; Thomas and Fellowes, 2016 ), and 3) instructors’ attitude towards applying mobile devices in education ( Gikas and Grant, 2013 ; Pimmer et al., 2013 ).
Figure 4 Barriers of mobile learning.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In spite of the rapid pace of technological innovation, the available tools still pose barriers to mobile learning ( Figure 4 ), key barriers can be categorized into three groups, which are 1) technology-related problems ( Frank and Kapila, 2017 ; Jarrahi et al., 2017 ; Masters et al., 2016 ; Zhang et al., 2016 ), 2) basic skills in using mobile devices ( Crane et al., 2011 ; Jeno et al., 2017 ; Mori and Harada, 2010 ; Thomas and Fellowes, 2016 ), and 3) instructors’ attitude towards applying mobile devices in education ( Gikas and Grant, 2013 ; Pimmer et al., 2013 ).
Figure 4 Barriers of mobile learning.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology-related problems include factors like the stability of Internet connections, appropriateness of keyboard and screen size, and distractions during learning through mobile devices ( Crane et al., 2011 ; Gu et al., 2011 ; Heflin et al., 2017 ; Jeno et al., 2017 ; Masters et al., 2016 ; Scott et al., 2017 ; So, 2016 ). Another challenge that learners face is the network security of free Wi-Fi in public places ( Masters et al., 2016 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With both RSS and Twitter becoming increasingly popular they are integrated into online-conscious students' lives; both have their respective benefits and drawbacks, but ultimately they share a basic underpinning; both aim to deliver information to an audience in a concise, compendious manner. Previous work has found that students prefer to receive synoptic, timely information which is of benefit and relevance to themselves (Crane & Benachour, 2010). With users increasingly preferring dynamic updates which optimize access to relevant and well informed information; RSS has previously been an obvious choice.…”
Section: Rss and Twitter Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One major issue for using Smartphones to access VLEs is the network coverage and infrastructure of the universities wireless network [6]. As well as the cost of using own network bandwidth to download academic materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for engaging students in higher education, developing an environment that engage student with university or using m-learning environment is a challenge; not only for infrastructure network limitation, but students consider their mobiles as a personal device. In fact, student having mobiles as the ultimate personal device means there is a strong sense of personal space which limits their perception of using them to engage with academic practices [6]. In this paper, we present an environment that aim to ease the process of gaining all needed information for students for them to be engaged with their university.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%